Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 29.2.2012 19:45, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 20.2.2012 22:56, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
The variable name rdnattr can be misleading. It is only used to give
the
name of hte RDN in something that can be renamed. Compare this to
On 20.2.2012 22:56, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
The variable name rdnattr can be misleading. It is only used to give the
name of hte RDN in something that can be renamed. Compare this to
something like netgroups where the DN has no visible relationship to the
content of the
Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 20.2.2012 22:56, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
The variable name rdnattr can be misleading. It is only used to give the
name of hte RDN in something that can be renamed. Compare this to
something like netgroups where the DN has no visible relationship to
Rob Crittenden wrote:
The variable name rdnattr can be misleading. It is only used to give the
name of hte RDN in something that can be renamed. Compare this to
something like netgroups where the DN has no visible relationship to the
content of the object (ipaUniqueId). Only those objects that
On 14.2.2012 22:16, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 14.2.2012 16:44, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 7.2.2012 20:25, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 7.2.2012 09:27, Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 11:52 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
On 15.2.2012 15:33, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 14.2.2012 22:16, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 14.2.2012 16:44, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 7.2.2012 20:25, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 7.2.2012 09:27, Martin Kosek
On 7.2.2012 20:25, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 7.2.2012 09:27, Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 11:52 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:58 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
There is some validation that
On 14.2.2012 16:44, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 7.2.2012 20:25, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 7.2.2012 09:27, Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 11:52 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:58 -0500, Rob
Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 14.2.2012 16:44, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 7.2.2012 20:25, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 7.2.2012 09:27, Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 11:52 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 11:52 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:58 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
There is some validation that we only need to apply when an entry is
being created, namely the key itself. This is to allow us to manage an
otherwise
Dne 7.2.2012 09:27, Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 11:52 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:58 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
There is some validation that we only need to apply when an entry is
being created, namely the key itself. This is
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 11:52 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:58 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
There is some validation that we only need to apply when an entry is
being created, namely the key itself. This is to allow us to manage an
Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 7.2.2012 09:27, Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 11:52 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:58 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
There is some validation that we only need to apply when an entry is
being created, namely the
Dne 7.2.2012 15:15, Rob Crittenden napsal(a):
Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 7.2.2012 09:27, Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 11:52 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:58 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
There is some validation that we only need to
Rob Crittenden wrote:
Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 7.2.2012 09:27, Martin Kosek napsal(a):
On Mon, 2012-02-06 at 11:52 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:58 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
There is some validation that we only need to apply when an entry is
On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 16:58 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
There is some validation that we only need to apply when an entry is
being created, namely the key itself. This is to allow us to manage an
otherwise illegal entry that finds its way into the system (i.e. migration).
Consider this.
There is some validation that we only need to apply when an entry is
being created, namely the key itself. This is to allow us to manage an
otherwise illegal entry that finds its way into the system (i.e. migration).
Consider this. We migrate a group with a space in it. This isn't allowed
in
17 matches
Mail list logo
