On Thu, 06 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
any order.
This patch has a bug, but I can't figure it out. We need to set
nsslapd-access-userattr-strict on
On Mon, 2014-02-10 at 15:11 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 06 Feb 2014, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
any order.
This patch has a bug, but I can't
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
any order.
This patch has a bug, but I can't figure it out. We need to set
nsslapd-access-userattr-strict on cn=config to off. However, during
the rpm
On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 15:14 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 17:37 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
any order.
This patch has a bug,
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 21:30 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 15:15 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
any
On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 12:15 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 21:30 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 15:15 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
This patch is
Hi Simo,
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2014-01-10 at 12:15 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
This is not what I had in mind, our use cases is something like this:
aci: (target=ldap:///dc=bar)(targetattr=*) (version 3.0; acl userattr
test; allow (add) userattr = managedby#USERDN;)
ldapmodify -D
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 17:37 -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
any order.
This patch has a bug, but I can't figure it out. We need to set
This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
any order.
This patch has a bug, but I can't figure it out. We need to set
nsslapd-access-userattr-strict on cn=config to off. However, during
the rpm installation, I get this error:
DEBUG Unhandled LDAPError:
On 01/09/2014 02:32 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
any order.
This patch has a bug, but I can't figure it out. We need to set
nsslapd-access-userattr-strict on cn=config to off. However, during
the rpm installation, I get
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
any order.
This patch has a bug, but I can't figure it out. We need to set
nsslapd-access-userattr-strict on cn=config to off.
Uhmm what is the effect on ACL
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
any order.
This patch has a bug, but I can't figure it out. We need to set
nsslapd-access-userattr-strict on cn=config to off.
Uhmm what is
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 15:15 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
any order.
This patch has a bug, but I can't figure it out. We need to set
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 15:15 -0800, Noriko Hosoi wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2014-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
This patch is independent from my patches 0028-0031 and can be merged in
any order.
This patch has a bug, but I can't figure it out. We need
14 matches
Mail list logo
