URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/539
Title: #539: Define errors_by_code in ipalib.errors
frasertweedale commented:
"""
Righto. I'll withdraw this PR for now and it will make a comeback closer to
landing the gssapi work.
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/539
Title: #539: Define errors_by_code in ipalib.errors
HonzaCholasta commented:
"""
Seems like an overkill for the ~2 types of errors which the code uses. Anyway,
I would rather wait before making any kind of decision based on cert-request
code
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/539
Title: #539: Define errors_by_code in ipalib.errors
frasertweedale commented:
"""
@HonzaCholasta when Dogtag execute the existing cert-request validation logic
(which will be extracted to a new function), if an exception gets raised Dogtag
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/539
Title: #539: Define errors_by_code in ipalib.errors
frasertweedale commented:
"""
@HonzaCholasta when Dogtag execute the existing cert-request validation logic
(which will be extracted to a new function), if an exception gets raised Dogtag
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/539
Title: #539: Define errors_by_code in ipalib.errors
HonzaCholasta commented:
"""
The codes are only relevant for XML-RPC. Why do you need them?
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/539#issuecomment-284319912
--
