URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/573
Title: #573: Provide centralized management of user short name resolution
MartinBasti commented:
"""
master:
* 594c87daf873ceec0c0cf3464bcb1aadb9f2b92a Short name resolution: introduce the
required schema
*
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/573
Title: #573: Provide centralized management of user short name resolution
martbab commented:
"""
Ok thanks for explanation.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/573#issuecomment-286464608
--
Manage your
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/573
Title: #573: Provide centralized management of user short name resolution
abbra commented:
"""
Yes, it is expected too. Remember that 'Default Trust View' is a view that
applies globally. You have already global setting to apply.
"""
See the
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/573
Title: #573: Provide centralized management of user short name resolution
martbab commented:
"""
PR rebased, I have fixed bugs in ID view objectclass handling and re-used the
trusted domain retrieval code in certmap plugin. This is a separate
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/573
Title: #573: Provide centralized management of user short name resolution
HonzaCholasta commented:
"""
Ah, right.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/573#issuecomment-286395012
--
Manage your subscription for
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/573
Title: #573: Provide centralized management of user short name resolution
MartinBasti commented:
"""
@HonzaCholasta it will break in case when idview entry is created on older
replica, so it is more safe to appending the objectclass dynamically
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/573
Title: #573: Provide centralized management of user short name resolution
HonzaCholasta commented:
"""
IMO you should add the object class to all existing idviews on upgrade rather
than add it on-demand.
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/573
Title: #573: Provide centralized management of user short name resolution
martbab commented:
"""
@HonzaCholasta I agree, I have removed the commit which introduces special
param handling and resorted to simple splitting in validator. I have also
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/573
Title: #573: Provide centralized management of user short name resolution
abbra commented:
"""
I don't see ACI.txt regenerated.
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/573#issuecomment-286097962
--
Manage your
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/573
Title: #573: Provide centralized management of user short name resolution
martbab commented:
"""
Updated PR, added ACIs and fixed Py2/Py3 compatibility of doctests.
"""
See the full comment at
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/573
Title: #573: Provide centralized management of user short name resolution
HonzaCholasta commented:
"""
I would rather avoid the refactoring in 4.5 - this is fragile code you are
touching and I'm afraid it might break in some cases (think
URL: https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/573
Title: #573: Provide centralized management of user short name resolution
MartinBasti commented:
"""
ACIs? AFAIK SSSD should be able to read this
"""
See the full comment at
https://github.com/freeipa/freeipa/pull/573#issuecomment-286094363
--
12 matches
Mail list logo
