Re: [Freeipa-devel] Should we stop supporting realm != upper(domain) installations?

2016-05-06 Thread Martin Basti
On 06.05.2016 15:55, Christian Heimes wrote: On 2016-05-06 15:50, Martin Babinsky wrote: On 05/06/2016 03:43 PM, Petr Spacek wrote: Hello, I wonder if we should stop supporting new installations where Kerberos realm != uppercase(primary DNS domain). It breaks a lot of stuff, is harder to

Re: [Freeipa-devel] Should we stop supporting realm != upper(domain) installations?

2016-05-06 Thread Christian Heimes
On 2016-05-06 15:50, Martin Babinsky wrote: > On 05/06/2016 03:43 PM, Petr Spacek wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I wonder if we should stop supporting new installations where >> Kerberos realm != uppercase(primary DNS domain). >> >> It breaks a lot of stuff, is harder to manager and docs are full of >>

Re: [Freeipa-devel] Should we stop supporting realm != upper(domain) installations?

2016-05-06 Thread Martin Babinsky
On 05/06/2016 03:43 PM, Petr Spacek wrote: Hello, I wonder if we should stop supporting new installations where Kerberos realm != uppercase(primary DNS domain). It breaks a lot of stuff, is harder to manager and docs are full of warnings discouraging it anyway. Do we really need to support it

[Freeipa-devel] Should we stop supporting realm != upper(domain) installations?

2016-05-06 Thread Petr Spacek
Hello, I wonder if we should stop supporting new installations where Kerberos realm != uppercase(primary DNS domain). It breaks a lot of stuff, is harder to manager and docs are full of warnings discouraging it anyway. Do we really need to support it for new installs? -- Petr^2 Spacek --