Ondrej Hamada wrote:
On 04/27/2012 02:36 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
I revisited ticket #2293 after it failed QE check. After some
considerations, I think we should revert this type of check for
permissions. Here is my reasoning:
1) This check fails when the target type does not have all its possib
On 04/27/2012 11:52 AM, Ondrej Hamada wrote:
> On 04/27/2012 02:36 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> I revisited ticket #2293 after it failed QE check. After some
>> considerations, I think we should revert this type of check for
>> permissions. Here is my reasoning:
>>
>> 1) This check fails when the tar
On 04/27/2012 02:36 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
I revisited ticket #2293 after it failed QE check. After some
considerations, I think we should revert this type of check for
permissions. Here is my reasoning:
1) This check fails when the target type does not have all its possible
objectclasses defin
I revisited ticket #2293 after it failed QE check. After some
considerations, I think we should revert this type of check for
permissions. Here is my reasoning:
1) This check fails when the target type does not have all its possible
objectclasses defined in the LDAPObject, like when users or hosts
