I've got two ancient (3.1?) IPA servers that have been upgraded over time.  
Last January things got really goofy with certificates and I got it all sorted. 
 However, now I've got an old issue creeping back in.  The 'transportCert 
cert-pki-kra' is mismatched between the CS.cfg and the tracked certificate.  
This is a multi-master setup.  The signing master seems to be the one that's 
off.  It's tracking the updated original 'transportCert cert-pki-kra' 
certificate.  However, the "secondary" master is tracking a newly generated 
'transportCert cert-pki-kra', which is also what both CS.cfg's are referencing. 
 Neither one of the certificates is expired.  Everything else seems to be in 
working order.  Here is ipa-healthcheck's only relevant error:

    "source": "ipahealthcheck.dogtag.ca", 
    "kw": {
      "msg": "Certificate 'transportCert cert-pki-kra' does not match the value 
of ca.connector.KRA.transportCert in /var/lib/pki/pki-tomcat/conf/ca/CS.cfg", 
      "configfile": "/var/lib/pki/pki-tomcat/conf/ca/CS.cfg", 
      "directive": "ca.connector.KRA.transportCert", 
      "key": "transportCert cert-pki-kra"
    }, 

So, what should I copy where to get this sorted?  It seems like the updated 
original 'transportCert cert-pki-kra' should be copied into the CS.cfg and then 
manually scp the NSS files from "primary" to "secondary"?  What commands would 
you use to do this?  I've got a lot of commands noted and am beginning to get 
confused as to which ones should be used to get this sorted.  Thanks.
_______________________________________________
FreeIPA-users mailing list -- freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to freeipa-users-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/freeipa-users@lists.fedorahosted.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to