[Freeipa-users] Re: FREEIPA - TLS - CN > 64 characters

2020-10-21 Thread Fraser Tweedale via FreeIPA-users
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 07:21:21AM -, Krzysztof O via FreeIPA-users wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:42:08PM +1000, Fraser Tweedale via FreeIPA-users > > wrote: > > Found the ticket: https://pagure.io/freeipa/issue/5706 > > > > I also wrote a blog post about this, detailing the workaroun

[Freeipa-users] Re: FREEIPA - TLS - CN > 64 characters

2020-10-21 Thread Krzysztof O via FreeIPA-users
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:42:08PM +1000, Fraser Tweedale via FreeIPA-users > wrote: > Found the ticket: https://pagure.io/freeipa/issue/5706 > > I also wrote a blog post about this, detailing the workaround > procedure: > https://frasertweedale.github.io/blog-redhat/posts/2020-10-20-ipa-cert-l

[Freeipa-users] Re: FREEIPA - TLS - CN > 64 characters

2020-10-19 Thread Fraser Tweedale via FreeIPA-users
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:42:08PM +1000, Fraser Tweedale via FreeIPA-users wrote: > On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 06:52:20AM -, Krzysztof O via > FreeIPA-users wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'd like to ask of is there any workaround for issuing > > certificates that will have Common Name longer that 6

[Freeipa-users] Re: FREEIPA - TLS - CN > 64 characters

2020-10-19 Thread Fraser Tweedale via FreeIPA-users
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 06:52:20AM -, Krzysztof O via FreeIPA-users wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to ask of is there any workaround for issuing > certificates that will have Common Name longer that 64 characters? > > For FREEIPA version less than 4.8.0 which is designated for RHEL > 8, when we

[Freeipa-users] Re: FREEIPA - TLS - CN > 64 characters

2020-10-19 Thread Alexander Bokovoy via FreeIPA-users
On ma, 19 loka 2020, Christian Heimes via FreeIPA-users wrote: On 19/10/2020 15.17, Krzysztof O via FreeIPA-users wrote: Krzysztof O via FreeIPA-users wrote: RFC 3280 defines the upper-bound of common name at 64 and is mandatory. What problem is this causing? rob When issuing CSR from the o

[Freeipa-users] Re: FREEIPA - TLS - CN > 64 characters

2020-10-19 Thread Christian Heimes via FreeIPA-users
On 19/10/2020 15.17, Krzysztof O via FreeIPA-users wrote: >> Krzysztof O via FreeIPA-users wrote: >> >> RFC 3280 defines the upper-bound of common name at 64 and is mandatory. >> >> What problem is this causing? >> >> rob > > When issuing CSR from the overcloud nodes, the CN field value exceeds th

[Freeipa-users] Re: FREEIPA - TLS - CN > 64 characters

2020-10-19 Thread Krzysztof O via FreeIPA-users
> Krzysztof O via FreeIPA-users wrote: > > RFC 3280 defines the upper-bound of common name at 64 and is mandatory. > > What problem is this causing? > > rob When issuing CSR from the overcloud nodes, the CN field value exceeds the 64 characters limit and the request fails. We expect to be able

[Freeipa-users] Re: FREEIPA - TLS - CN > 64 characters

2020-10-19 Thread Rob Crittenden via FreeIPA-users
Krzysztof O via FreeIPA-users wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to ask of is there any workaround for issuing certificates that will > have Common Name longer that 64 characters? > > For FREEIPA version less than 4.8.0 which is designated for RHEL 8, when we > will have to stay with current version