On ti, 02 marras 2021, lejeczek via FreeIPA-users wrote:
On 02/11/2021 19:52, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On ti, 02 marras 2021, lejeczek via FreeIPA-users wrote:
On 02/11/2021 13:14, François Cami wrote:
Hi,
There is probably a bug that prevents a C9S IPA replica with a
CA to
be installed
On 02/11/2021 19:52, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On ti, 02 marras 2021, lejeczek via FreeIPA-users wrote:
On 02/11/2021 13:14, François Cami wrote:
Hi,
There is probably a bug that prevents a C9S IPA replica
with a CA to
be installed against an IPA cluster running older
versions (RHEL8).
O
On ti, 02 marras 2021, Alexander Bokovoy via FreeIPA-users wrote:
On ti, 02 marras 2021, lejeczek via FreeIPA-users wrote:
On 02/11/2021 13:14, François Cami wrote:
Hi,
There is probably a bug that prevents a C9S IPA replica with a CA to
be installed against an IPA cluster running older vers
On ti, 02 marras 2021, lejeczek via FreeIPA-users wrote:
On 02/11/2021 13:14, François Cami wrote:
Hi,
There is probably a bug that prevents a C9S IPA replica with a CA to
be installed against an IPA cluster running older versions (RHEL8).
Otherwise you can compare the versions:
Fedora: https
On 02/11/2021 13:14, François Cami wrote:
Hi,
There is probably a bug that prevents a C9S IPA replica with a CA to
be installed against an IPA cluster running older versions (RHEL8).
Otherwise you can compare the versions:
Fedora: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=11554
Hi,
There is probably a bug that prevents a C9S IPA replica with a CA to
be installed against an IPA cluster running older versions (RHEL8).
Otherwise you can compare the versions:
Fedora: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=11554
C9S: https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/koji/p
