>We return to this discussion once in a while...
>
>Samba 4 tries to do it and still struggles after many years
>of development. We definitely would look at Samba 4 again when we see it
>Sufficiently ready but this is not a priority for 2011.
Maybe this is the reason why freeipa has that less
Sorry forgot last note:
>From my point of view, for the moment its not that much which is required. It
>would only be supporting the samba ldap attributes in the ldap server and
>extension of the management framework to create samba domains, users, groups
>and machine accounts until samba 4 is s
