[Freeipa-users] Fwd: packages for Fedora 14

2011-04-08 Thread Stephen Ingram
-- Forwarded message -- From: Stephen Ingram Date: Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:02 PM Subject: Re: [Freeipa-users] packages for Fedora 14 To: d...@redhat.com I installed the rc2 version and used the f14-testing repo to accommodate. Would this work for v2 or has dogtag been revved again?

Re: [Freeipa-users] packages for Fedora 14

2011-04-08 Thread Dmitri Pal
On 04/08/2011 04:51 PM, Stephen Ingram wrote: > Will ipa-v2 packages be released for Fedora 14 since Fedora 15 final > is not yet available? The issue with F14 is that it still has an older version of the Certificate System (Dogtag). We can't release as there will be collisions but the upstream bi

[Freeipa-users] packages for Fedora 14

2011-04-08 Thread Stephen Ingram
Will ipa-v2 packages be released for Fedora 14 since Fedora 15 final is not yet available? Steve ___ Freeipa-users mailing list Freeipa-users@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users

Re: [Freeipa-users] 6.1 beta

2011-04-08 Thread Kevin Unthank
On 04/08/2011 06:26 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote: On 04/08/2011 02:38 AM, Sigbjorn Lie wrote: Hi Kevin, Please disregards Steven Jones' ranting, this was not the kind of feedback I was looking for. Ok, I do like the wider options for channels in Red Hat, but this bring me to my next question: Will

Re: [Freeipa-users] Auto membership plugin

2011-04-08 Thread Dmitri Pal
On 04/08/2011 11:49 AM, JR Aquino wrote: > Is there any way to capture a description associated with the regex -> group > mapping? > > I was thinking that after time, it would be important to look back on rules > and know why they were put there. > > Particularly in the case of regex, since it ma

Re: [Freeipa-users] Auto membership plugin

2011-04-08 Thread JR Aquino
Is there any way to capture a description associated with the regex -> group mapping? I was thinking that after time, it would be important to look back on rules and know why they were put there. Particularly in the case of regex, since it may not be completely obvious by looking back at alpha

Re: [Freeipa-users] 6.1 beta

2011-04-08 Thread Jan-Frode Myklebust
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 09:26:42AM -0400, Dmitri Pal wrote: > I will leave to Kevin to describe details but in a nutshell the > replication and or synchronization with AD (same channel) is not free. > Red Hat worked out a competitive pricing model for this product and some > of the cost is attache

Re: [Freeipa-users] 6.1 beta

2011-04-08 Thread Dmitri Pal
On 04/08/2011 02:38 AM, Sigbjorn Lie wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Please disregards Steven Jones' ranting, this was not the kind of feedback I > was looking for. > > Ok, I do like the wider options for channels in Red Hat, but this bring me to > my next question: > Will there be an extra charge for thi

Re: [Freeipa-users] IPA Client join

2011-04-08 Thread Roland Kaeser
Hello Rob Thanks for the srpm. Sorry but I just had time now to compile and test it. While installing and testing ipa-client-install, I found a small installation dependency problem in the spec. To install the rpm the package nss-tools should be required. This provides /usr/bin/certutil which

Re: [Freeipa-users] 6.1 beta

2011-04-08 Thread Sigbjorn Lie
On Fri, April 8, 2011 09:48, Natxo Asenjo wrote: > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Sigbjorn Lie wrote: > > >> Ok, I do like the wider options for channels in Red Hat, but this bring me >> to my next question: >> Will there be an extra charge for this add on channel, or will this be >> included

Re: [Freeipa-users] 6.1 beta

2011-04-08 Thread Natxo Asenjo
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Sigbjorn Lie wrote: > Ok, I do like the wider options for channels in Red Hat, but this bring me to > my next question: > Will there be an extra charge for this add on channel, or will this be > included in the base > subscription? > > If $answer = yes { Why does