Hi Alex,
Thank you for your prompt reply.
Amabri community going to release new version 2.1, where they are providing
user specific Kerberos like 1.7.
For now i'll go ahead with MIT Kerberos.
Regards,
Shaik
On 23 April 2015 at 13:51, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Shaik M wr
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Shaik M wrote:
Hi,
We have recently deployed FreeIPA for our Hadoop environment.
Recently, Ambari community released 2.0, where this version supports MIT
kerberos. Which means Ambri create the all service principals using with
"kadmin.local".
As I know, "kadmin.local" wont
Hi,
yes, you can definitely use a different certificate in the meantime,
although it can't be self-signed.
Honza
Dne 20.4.2015 v 14:17 David Dejaeghere napsal(a):
Hi,
Let me know how I can assist.
In the meantime could I setup a replica using a different certificate?
Self signed or anything
Hi,
We have recently deployed FreeIPA for our Hadoop environment.
Recently, Ambari community released 2.0, where this version supports MIT
kerberos. Which means Ambri create the all service principals using with
"kadmin.local".
As I know, "kadmin.local" wont work for FreeIPA kerberos to create
Roderick Johnstone wrote:
> On 22/04/15 14:30, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> On 04/21/2015 01:13 PM, Roderick Johnstone wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I also need to integrate Solaris 10 clients with freeipa servers.
>>>
>>> I've been round many resources, eg freeipa wiki, Fedora and Red Hat
>>> manuals, various bug
On 22/04/15 18:40, Cory Carlton wrote:
Hey all,
I for some reason do not ever get responses from doing DNS lookups to
my new servers that have been stood up and replicated as Masters with
CA, and DNS options entered at command line.
Is there any trick or configuration to allow anonymous for
Hi Dmitri,
I'd be happy to test sssd 1.13 alpha. Is there any easy was to install on
Ubuntu, or do I need to pull and compile from source?
Thanks,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 04/17/2015 09:12 PM, Benjamen Keroack wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We have a number of local groups
On 22/04/15 14:30, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 04/21/2015 01:13 PM, Roderick Johnstone wrote:
Hi
I also need to integrate Solaris 10 clients with freeipa servers.
I've been round many resources, eg freeipa wiki, Fedora and Red Hat
manuals, various bug trackers and the freeipa-users mailing list.
It
Hey all,
I for some reason do not ever get responses from doing DNS lookups to my
new servers that have been stood up and replicated as Masters with CA, and
DNS options entered at command line.
Is there any trick or configuration to allow anonymous for my servers
without IPA Client installed to t
ALL,
I'm attempting to complete a replica install and the system is bombing out on
the gssapi portion of the SSH key configuration. I can ssh and selinux is
permissive.
Could not SSH into remote host. Error output:
OpenSSH_6.6.1, OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
debug1: Reading configura
On 04/21/2015 01:13 PM, Roderick Johnstone wrote:
Hi
I also need to integrate Solaris 10 clients with freeipa servers.
I've been round many resources, eg freeipa wiki, Fedora and Red Hat
manuals, various bug trackers and the freeipa-users mailing list.
It looks to me as if this:
https://www.
Dear All,
Permission of all users in our 300 + machines are created with 755 instead
of 700. I have checked the same in forums and got the one.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23040225/incorrect-permissions-when-home-directory-is-automatically-created-in-freeipa
Let me know whether I have to
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 12:43:47AM +0200, Mateusz Malek wrote:
>
>
> On 15.04.2015 at 15:08, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> >On 04/10/2015 08:13 AM, Mateusz Malek wrote:
> >>I'm about to migrate my OpenLDAP-based environment to FreeIPA, however
> >>I've hit some weird performance problems. When
On 21.04.2015 22:45, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (20/04/15 17:54), Andrew Sacamano wrote:
>> Thanks again, Lukas!
>>
>> I was wondering if the overlaps of names was a problem, so I redid parts of
>> my IPA setup to rename them - thanks for pointing out the ticket!
>>
>> Also, your suggestion to use
14 matches
Mail list logo