8><--
What do you feel is the biggest struggle?
Is it the base core features, or is it external integration pains for things
feature that don't exist yet?
8><---
Core functionality is fine and I'm very impressed with the ui and IPA's paper
capability. You are correct nothing else on
On May 14, 2012, at 9:50 PM, "Steven Jones" wrote:
> 8><-
>
> Mileage may vary.
>
> I for one have found no suitable scalable substitute for FreeIPA.
>
> 8><--
>
> Sure but depends on capability and experience, I for one am
> struggling.while significantly easier than sa
8><-
Mileage may vary.
I for one have found no suitable scalable substitute for FreeIPA.
8><--
Sure but depends on capability and experience, I for one am
struggling.while significantly easier than say 389 (which I gave up on),
its still a huge step up...
regards
___
On May 13, 2012, at 11:13 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:53:34AM +, JR Aquino wrote:
>>
>> I currently run over 21 (soon to be 42) Production FreeIPA servers. These
>> are globally dispersed in every major continent.
>> They support over 5,000 servers (Mostly RHE
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:53:34AM +, JR Aquino wrote:
>
> I currently run over 21 (soon to be 42) Production FreeIPA servers. These are
> globally dispersed in every major continent.
> They support over 5,000 servers (Mostly RHEL with some Fedora, and Ubuntu
> mixed in), 1,000 Networking de
.m.
To: Freeipa-users@redhat.com<mailto:Freeipa-users@redhat.com>
Subject: [Freeipa-users] FreeIPA and others
Hi All,
I was considering different centralized authentication/authorization services
such as FreeIPA, 389 and Open ldap to deploy into our network in order to have
a good centraliz
ail.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, 12 May 2012 6:18 a.m.
> *To:* Freeipa-users@redhat.com
> *Subject:* [Freeipa-users] FreeIPA and others
>
> Hi All,
>
> I was considering different centralized authentication/authorization
> services such as FreeIPA, 389 and Open ldap to deploy into
8><
Absolutely, the pain threshold of setting those component up and getting
them to play together is high. One of the primary design goals of
FreeIPA is to eliminate those pain points so you can focus on
administrating your user base.
8><
Does seems to be a great success, the b
ers-boun...@redhat.com [freeipa-users-boun...@redhat.com] on
behalf of Chandan Kumar [chandank.ku...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, 12 May 2012 6:18 a.m.
To: Freeipa-users@redhat.com
Subject: [Freeipa-users] FreeIPA and others
Hi All,
I was considering different centralized authentication/authorizat
Thanks for the info. Now I will start working on to setup FreeIPA,
hopefully it heals rather than aggravating the pains :-)
Thanks
Chandan
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 1:16 PM, John Dennis wrote:
> On 05/11/2012 03:51 PM, Chandan Kumar wrote:
>
>> Thanks John for reply.
>>
>> Ok. So basically it
On 05/11/2012 03:51 PM, Chandan Kumar wrote:
Thanks John for reply.
Ok. So basically it integrate various subsystems required to have a full
fledged AAA system and give the end user a single controlling interface
to control various components.
Excellent summary.
So will its webgui enable to
Thanks John for reply.
Ok. So basically it integrate various subsystems required to have a full
fledged AAA system and give the end user a single controlling interface to
control various components.
So will its webgui enable to control 389, Krb and Radius configurations
too? Because if I see each
On 05/11/2012 02:18 PM, Chandan Kumar wrote:
Hi All,
I was considering different centralized authentication/authorization
services such as FreeIPA, 389 and Open ldap to deploy into our network
in order to have a good centralized user authentication/authorization
machanism. I was wondering what a
Hi All,
I was considering different centralized authentication/authorization
services such as FreeIPA, 389 and Open ldap to deploy into our network in
order to have a good centralized user authentication/authorization
machanism. I was wondering what are they key that FreeIPA provides as
compared t
14 matches
Mail list logo
