RE: FreeRadius Authentification Problem

2003-08-14 Thread Robert LaGrasse
Authentification Problem Atanu Das wrote: Hi Serg - Original Message - From: Serg Shipaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:24 PM Subject: Re: FreeRadius Authentification Problem In naslist the following row, I can find: 212.53.35.102

FreeRadius Authentification Problem

2003-08-14 Thread Serg Shipaev
Hi all! My name is Serg Shipaev. I'm novice in in stallation and using of FreeRadius. And of course, I've got some troubles there. ;-) The trouble is the following: FreeRadius can't authenificate my NAS... Here the log file: Starting - reading configuration files ... reread_config: reading

Re: FreeRadius Authentification Problem

2003-08-14 Thread Atanu Das
Hi Serg - Original Message - From: Serg Shipaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:24 PM Subject: Re: FreeRadius Authentification Problem In naslist the following row, I can find: 212.53.35.102212.53.35.102cisco no more info

Re: FreeRadius Authentification Problem

2003-08-14 Thread Serg Shipaev
Hi all! Atanu Das wrote: Serg Shipaev wrote: That's a trouble: secret keys in clients, clients.conf and in NAS server are the same! I think that's a trouble of MS-CHAP (MD5 I think) authentification. The NAS client is a software of Cisco VoIP gateway type. what about the naslist file?

Re: FreeRadius Authentification Problem

2003-08-14 Thread Serg Shipaev
Serg Shipaev wrote: That's a trouble: secret keys in clients, clients.conf and in NAS server are the same! I think that's a trouble of MS-CHAP (MD5 I think) authentification. The NAS client is a software of Cisco VoIP gateway type. -- Best regards, Serg Shipaev, VoIP eXchange e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: FreeRadius Authentification Problem

2003-08-14 Thread Serg Shipaev
Alan DeKok wrote: Serg Shipaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's a trouble: secret keys in clients, clients.conf and in NAS server are the same! Your trouble is larger than that. You've repeatedly said that the authentication process doesn't work. Yet the only log you posted contained

Re: FreeRadius Authentification Problem

2003-08-10 Thread Alan DeKok
Serg Shipaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, I see it. But, I meant authentification process for NAS, not for any client of this NAS. NASes are never authenticated. As I understand, of RADIUS authentification process, the 1-step is check NAS, then aaa for client of this NAS. Can you

Re: FreeRadius Authentification Problem

2003-08-10 Thread Atanu Das
Hi Serg - Original Message - From: Serg Shipaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:44 PM Subject: Re: FreeRadius Authentification Problem Serg Shipaev wrote: That's a trouble: secret keys in clients, clients.conf and in NAS server

Re: FreeRadius Authentification Problem

2003-08-09 Thread Serg Shipaev
Atanu Das wrote: Hi Serg - Original Message - From: Serg Shipaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 2:24 PM Subject: Re: FreeRadius Authentification Problem In naslist the following row, I can find: 212.53.35.102212.53.35.102cisco no more

Re: FreeRadius Authentification Problem

2003-08-08 Thread barry
- Original Message - From: Serg Shipaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 9:46 AM Subject: FreeRadius Authentification Problem Hi all! My name is Serg Shipaev. I'm novice in in stallation and using of FreeRadius. And of course, I've got some

Re: FreeRadius Authentification Problem

2003-08-06 Thread Atanu Das
Hi Serg, - Original Message - From: Serg Shipaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 1:16 PM Subject: FreeRadius Authentification Problem Ready to process requests. rad_recv: Accounting-Request packet from host 212.53.35.102:32803, id=107, length

Re: FreeRadius Authentification Problem

2003-08-06 Thread Alan DeKok
Serg Shipaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's a trouble: secret keys in clients, clients.conf and in NAS server are the same! Your trouble is larger than that. You've repeatedly said that the authentication process doesn't work. Yet the only log you posted contained NO authentication