Good deal! If 1.0 comes out soon and it has the RLM return code fix
(and the static link fix?) for EAP, I'll be a happy camper. If our
management shifts gears and decides they need the RLM fix sooner, I'll
check back here and see if anything is new, and pull the latest CVS and
work from there
Dave Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This leads me to a quick question about where we are for EAP and where
> we're going. I still have an item on my Todo list to fix rlm_eap and
> the submodules to use RLM return codes, so, for example, an EAP subtype
> could return RLM_HANDLED to indicate
Hi,
This leads me to a quick question about where we are for EAP and where
we're going. I still have an item on my Todo list to fix rlm_eap and
the submodules to use RLM return codes, so, for example, an EAP subtype
could return RLM_HANDLED to indicate an incoming packet should just be
dropped
