I would argue the quality issue of Cisco equipment. The quality of
their mid and high range equipment has been very good in my
experiences. In addition to other vendors remote access, I have
installed/admin'ed 5200's, a 5300 and several 5800's. Cisco's remote
access equipment, IMHO, takes a
product...
Thank you kindly, once again
--
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Pilley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:51 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Cisco AS
> On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 01:36:12AM +0200, Chris Kni
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 01:36:12AM +0200, Chris Knipe wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> We've been having allot of problems lately with our Cisco AS series access servers.
>We're heard that Cisco does make poor Remote Access? products and that it is actually
>quite common for Cisco AS to drop calls whe
Hi everyone,
We've been having allot of problems lately with our
Cisco AS series access servers. We're heard that Cisco does make poor
Remote Access? products and that it is actually quite common for Cisco AS to
drop calls when the CPU or Port Utilization becomes to high. This would
main
