Re: Plea for assistance with FreeRADIUS and class attribute #25 issues!

2002-03-18 Thread Chris Parker
At 01:08 PM 3/18/2002 -0700, Darrell Shandrow wrote: >Hi Alan, > >Thanks for your response. > >First, why should I upgrade to 0.5? Do its improvements have something to >do with the issues I am reporting? Quite possibly. There have been many bugs fixed from 0.3 to 0.5. Overall stability is imp

Re: Plea for assistance with FreeRADIUS and class attribute #25 issues!

2002-03-18 Thread Alan DeKok
Darrell Shandrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First, why should I upgrade to 0.5? Do its improvements have something to > do with the issues I am reporting? See the main web page for one large reason to upgrade. Also, there's no point in tracking down a bug in an old release. The problem

Re: Plea for assistance with FreeRADIUS and class attribute #25 issues!

2002-03-18 Thread Alan DeKok
Darrell Shandrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm running FreeRADIUS 0.3 using support for username collision. You SHOULD upgrade to 0.5. > I thus require the RADIUS class attribute to be handled by all NAS > connected to my FreeRADIUS servers. Uh... what exactly do you mean by "handled"?

Plea for assistance with FreeRADIUS and class attribute #25 issues!

2002-03-18 Thread Darrell Shandrow
Hi all, I am in serious need of assistance! Any help will be very, very much appreciated. I'm running FreeRADIUS 0.3 using support for username collision. I thus require the RADIUS class attribute to be handled by all NAS connected to my FreeRADIUS servers. I seem to have two types of NAS