> From: Alan DeKok
> Sent: Sunday, 22 June 2003 10:50 PM
> Oliver Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The BSD style check is done last. BSD style gethostby is not
> > thread safe on glibc2 systems. Cause the BSD check is done last, the
> > configure script overwrites the previous detected GNU
Oliver Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oh, and when submitting patches to configure.in, I'd suggest submitting
> > the equivalent patch to configure. Otherwise if someone overlooks the
> > regeneration, it appears to not work for no apparent reason.
>
> Hmmm. I did not do this, cause other pro
Oliver Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The BSD style check is done last. BSD style gethostby is not
> thread safe on glibc2 systems. Cause the BSD check is done last, the
> configure script overwrites the previous detected GNU style
> gethostbyaddr_r. Just look at the diff, you will see that
> From: Oliver Graf
> Sent: Sunday, 22 June 2003 6:36 PM
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 05:58:42PM +1000, Paul Hampson wrote:
> > However, problems with the patch:
> > the patch to src/lib/misc.c shows a cut and paste oversight by testing
> > GETHOSTBYADDRRSTYLE when choosing the gethostbyname_r functi
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 05:58:42PM +1000, Paul Hampson wrote:
> > But the server ALREADY uses the '..._r' functions. What's the
> > problem? Or am I missing something?
>
> The problems are:
> gethostbyaddr_r determination will pick BSD (The non-_r version)
> over GNU or SYSV. This is because t
> From: Alan DeKok
> Sent: Sunday, 22 June 2003 9:48 AM
> Oliver Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > This patchs enables the detection of the correct
> > > > gethostby(name|addr)_r command, which is needed by a threaded radiusd.
> Unless I'm greatly mistaken, that functionality was added ma
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 08:47:25AM +0200, Oliver Graf wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 07:47:37PM -0400, Alan DeKok wrote:
> > Oliver Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > This patchs enables the detection of the correct
> > > > > gethostby(name|addr)_r command, which is needed by a threaded ra
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 07:47:37PM -0400, Alan DeKok wrote:
> Oliver Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > This patchs enables the detection of the correct
> > > > gethostby(name|addr)_r command, which is needed by a threaded radiusd.
>
> Unless I'm greatly mistaken, that functionality was add
Oliver Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This patchs enables the detection of the correct
> > > gethostby(name|addr)_r command, which is needed by a threaded radiusd.
Unless I'm greatly mistaken, that functionality was added many
months ago. See 'src/main/misc.c'
> > I haven't looked at th
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 02:52:50AM +1000, Paul Hampson wrote:
> > From: Oliver Graf
> > Sent: Saturday, 21 June 2003 12:39 AM
>
> > This patchs enables the detection of the correct
> > gethostby(name|addr)_r command, which is needed by a threaded radiusd.
>
> Which patch?
Hmpf... now its attache
> From: Oliver Graf
> Sent: Saturday, 21 June 2003 12:39 AM
> This patchs enables the detection of the correct
> gethostby(name|addr)_r command, which is needed by a threaded radiusd.
Which patch?
Oh, did you have a look at the CVS history for configure.in and
configure.in? I noticed the other d
11 matches
Mail list logo
