Hi,
Try: --without-threads
Regards
Alex Kasatkin escreveu:
Hi!
There is the problem with gethostbyname detection in 0.9.1:
dev:~/freeradius-0.9.1# uname -prs
FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p4 i386
configure says:
checking gethostbyaddr_r() syntax... GNU-style
checking gethostbyname_r() syntax... configu
hi,
--without-threads works. It's possible to use threads under freebsd ?
regards.
--
S.N.O.O.P.: Synthetic Networked Organism Optimized for Peacekeeping
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
> From: Alex Kasatkin
> Sent: Tuesday, 9 September 2003 1:40 AM
> There is the problem with gethostbyname detection in 0.9.1:
> dev:~/freeradius-0.9.1# uname -prs
> FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p4 i386
>
> configure says:
>
> checking gethostbyaddr_r() syntax... GNU-style
> checking gethostbyname_r() sy
Paul Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[skipped]
> What's c_r? Is that where the ghostby{addr,name}_r stuff lives? I guess that could
> be detected as
> a required library for the gethostby{addr,name}_r function-using modules (hopefully
> just libradius)
AFAIR it's threaded c library.
man 3 pth
> From: Alex Kasatkin
> Sent: Thursday, 11 September 2003 12:16 AM
> Paul Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [skipped]
> > What's c_r? Is that where the ghostby{addr,name}_r stuff lives? I guess that could
> > be detected as
> > a required library for the gethostby{addr,name}_r function-using mo
re,
Paul Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > From: Alex Kasatkin
> > Sent: Thursday, 11 September 2003 12:16 AM
>
> > Paul Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > [skipped]
> > > What's c_r? Is that where the ghostby{addr,name}_r stuff lives? I guess that
> > > could be detected as
> > > a requ
Alex Kasatkin wrote:
> > > > > When I've add -lc_r, rlm_dbm_parser links normally, but with some warnings.
> > > > What's c_r? Is that where the ghostby{addr,name}_r stuff lives? I guess that
> > > > could be detected as
> > > > a required library for the gethostby{addr,name}_r function-using mod
> From: Alex Kasatkin
> Sent: Thursday, 11 September 2003 12:43 AM
> Paul Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > From: Alex Kasatkin
> > > Sent: Thursday, 11 September 2003 12:16 AM
> > > Paul Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > What's c_r? Is that where the ghostby{addr,name}_r stuff lives?
"Paul Hampson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, maybe not by preference?... _I_ think they're preferable,
> 'cause it'll ease us eventually supporting IPv6 in the server (as
> opposed to IPv6 support in RADIUS, which I _think_ we have?)
There was a patch just before 0.9.0 which added 'ipv6addr
