Re: Re[2]: dictionary.foundry and rlm_passwd

2003-10-17 Thread Alan DeKok
3APA3A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > AD> It's listed as "experimental". If sufficient people judge it to be > AD> stable, then it can be added to the list of stable modules. > > I think with latest fixes it can be safely marked as 'stable'. Relying > on amount of questions I receive it looks

Re[2]: dictionary.foundry and rlm_passwd

2003-10-15 Thread 3APA3A
Dear Alan DeKok, --Wednesday, October 15, 2003, 8:30:56 PM, you wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> Also, why is rlm_passwd not built by default? It seems to be working >> well for me. AD> It's listed as "experimental". If sufficient people judge it to be AD> stable, then it can be added to the l

Re: dictionary.foundry and rlm_passwd

2003-10-15 Thread Alan DeKok
Dave Mussulman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The file dictionary.foundry is included in the share/freeradius > directory, but does not have an $INCLUDE line in the main dictionary > file. If it works for you, it can be added in. > Also, why is rlm_passwd not built by default? It seems to be wor

dictionary.foundry and rlm_passwd

2003-10-15 Thread Dave Mussulman
I'm curious about two things that aren't enabled by default in 0.9.1, and as far as I could tell still that way in the CVS tree. The file dictionary.foundry is included in the share/freeradius directory, but does not have an $INCLUDE line in the main dictionary file. The dictionary.foundry file s