RE: rlm_ippool and ippooltool

2003-07-28 Thread Kostas Kalevras
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Paul Hampson wrote: > > From: Gustavo Lozano > > Sent: Monday, 28 July 2003 1:44 PM > > > So are you rewriting the rlm_ippool already? > > Yes. I have a preliminary patch, but I haven't posted it since > it doesn't do ML-PPP, and I haven't tested it due to my > development/tes

RE: rlm_ippool and ippooltool

2003-07-28 Thread Gustavo Lozano
Post it please :) I can check it... Rgds On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 11:12, Paul Hampson wrote: > > From: Gustavo Lozano > > Sent: Monday, 28 July 2003 1:44 PM > > > So are you rewriting the rlm_ippool already? > > Yes. I have a preliminary patch, but I haven't posted it since > it doesn't do ML-PP

Re: rlm_ippool and ippooltool

2003-07-28 Thread Alan DeKok
"Paul Hampson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here's my patch to ippooltool... There was some discussion > of ippooltool being added to the FreeRADIUS CVS earlier. > Was that ever decided for or against? Tools which administer the files used *only* by FreeRADIUS should be part of the server. Al

RE: rlm_ippool and ippooltool

2003-07-28 Thread Paul Hampson
> From: Gustavo Lozano > Sent: Monday, 28 July 2003 1:44 PM > So are you rewriting the rlm_ippool already? Yes. I have a preliminary patch, but I haven't posted it since it doesn't do ML-PPP, and I haven't tested it due to my development/testing machine's hard disk biting the dust. > The problem

RE: rlm_ippool and ippooltool

2003-07-27 Thread Gustavo Lozano
So are you rewriting the rlm_ippool already? The problem with the current module seems very populated and as a matter of fact It is very persistent. We needed to write a script to correct the dbs every 10 minutes... On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 22:31, Paul Hampson wrote: > > From: Gustavo Lozano > >

RE: rlm_ippool and ippooltool

2003-07-27 Thread Paul Hampson
> From: Gustavo Lozano > Sent: Monday, 28 July 2003 1:19 PM > Paul. > > Not everybody uses Linux :), inet_aton() is not present in Solaris as > example, dont ask my why, I didnt checked, so may be you can use another > function to do the translation of the Ip address into data. According to my m

Re: rlm_ippool and ippooltool

2003-07-27 Thread Gustavo Lozano
Paul. Not everybody uses Linux :), inet_aton() is not present in Solaris as example, dont ask my why, I didnt checked, so may be you can use another function to do the translation of the Ip address into data. Rgds Gustavo On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 00:40, Paul Hampson wrote: > (I'm assuming all int

rlm_ippool and ippooltool

2003-07-25 Thread Paul Hampson
(I'm assuming all interested developers are _also_ on the -users list...) I've just hit the problem others have hit before about the ippool shrinking for no apparent reason. I'm not sure what does it exactly, as I'm more interested in the rewrite of rlm_ippool I proposed earlier and someone else a