An RPM of what? Freeradius?
Gene
-Original Message-
From: Peter Nixon [mailto:listuser;peternixon.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 4:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: solaris/sparc Forte
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002 20:07:46 -0500
Gene Parks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002 20:07:46 -0500
Gene Parks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a similar problem when I ran make on my Solaris 8 box but I
decided to take another route. I installed SUSE 7.3 for SPARC and
everything is working great now.
Gene Parks
VIP Direct
Finally! Another SuSE user on
Hello.
Is it possible to compile freeradius on the solaris 8 (sparc) with Forte?
I've got an error, it seems the source are written for gcc..
Does somebody has a binary for solaris/sparc?
Gregory G. V.
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Haan, de, Jan wrote:
Have fun! Was compiling it as I saw your e-mail
on the list.
It is very kind, thank you!
Would be nice to know how it was compiled?
I have compiled by gcc sucsessfuly, and could not by Forte... What I did
wrong I do not know. May be you have used some
At 02:54 PM 11/4/2002 +0200, Gregory G. V. wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Haan, de, Jan wrote:
Have fun! Was compiling it as I saw your e-mail
on the list.
It is very kind, thank you!
Would be nice to know how it was compiled?
I have compiled by gcc sucsessfuly, and could not by Forte... What I
: Re: solaris/sparc Forte
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Haan, de, Jan wrote:
Have fun! Was compiling it as I saw your e-mail
on the list
It is very kind, thank you!
Would be nice to know how it was compiled?
I have compiled by gcc sucsessfuly, and could not by Forte... What I did
wrong I do
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Chris Parker wrote:
At 02:54 PM 11/4/2002 +0200, Gregory G. V. wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Haan, de, Jan wrote:
Have fun! Was compiling it as I saw your e-mail
on the list
It is very kind, thank you!
Would be nice to know how it was compiled?
I have compiled by
At 05:58 PM 11/4/2002 +0200, Gregory G. V. wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Chris Parker wrote:
At 02:54 PM 11/4/2002 +0200, Gregory G. V. wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Haan, de, Jan wrote:
Have fun! Was compiling it as I saw your e-mail
on the list
It is very kind, thank you!
Would be
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Chris Parker wrote:
Post the errors you are seeing please. If you don't it's hard for us
to fix the problem
If the makefiles are built wrong, the post what the makefiles should look
like to enable compilation to complete
Ok. error.tar.gz has the run script for run
At 08:15 PM 11/4/2002 +0200, Gregory G. V. wrote:
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Chris Parker wrote:
Post the errors you are seeing please. If you don't it's hard for us
to fix the problem
If the makefiles are built wrong, the post what the makefiles should look
like to enable compilation to complete
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Chris Parker wrote:
Ok. error.tar.gz has the run script for run configure, the Makefile from
libltdl and the output of stderr stdout from gmake. It is with -fast
option
normal.tar.gz contain the same but without -fast options, so it compiled
normal
fixed.tar.gz contains
At 08:53 PM 11/4/2002 +0200, Gregory G. V. wrote:
CFLAGS = -g -DNDEBUG
---
CFLAGS = -g -mt -D_REENTRANT -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DNDEBUG
Please try the latest CVS. I believe it has the problem fixed already.
-Chris
--
\\\|||/// \ StarNet Inc. \ Chris Parker
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Chris Parker wrote:
At 08:53 PM 11/4/2002 +0200, Gregory G. V. wrote:
CFLAGS = -g -DNDEBUG
---
CFLAGS = -g -mt -D_REENTRANT -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -DNDEBUG
Please try the latest CVS. I believe it has the problem fixed already
Ok, I have tried, here how I run
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Chris Parker wrote:
Post the errors you are seeing please. If you don't it's hard for us
to fix the problem
If the makefiles are built wrong, the post what the makefiles should look
like to enable compilation to complete
it seems libltdl has a problem _only_ if
Gregory G. V. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it seems libltdl has a problem _only_ if the configure has been run with
CPPFLAGS defined... so something seems to be wrong...
and I do not see another way to define -fast option
I thought CPPFLAGS must be in each Makefile... as well as LDFLAGS.
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Alan DeKok wrote:
Gregory G. V. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it seems libltdl has a problem _only_ if the configure has been run with
CPPFLAGS defined... so something seems to be wrong..
and I do not see another way to define -fast option...
I thought CPPFLAGS must be in
Gregory G. V. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, CPPFLAGS are for C++ compilation. Use CFLAGS for C
I have tried to run the configure with CFLAGS=-fast without any luck. I
could not find any -fast option in the Makefiles, and compiler works
without it.
Have you tried looking for CFLAGS in the
On Mon, 4 Nov 2002, Alan DeKok wrote:
Gregory G. V. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, CPPFLAGS are for C++ compilation. Use CFLAGS for C
I have tried to run the configure with CFLAGS=-fast without any luck. I
could not find any -fast option in the Makefiles, and compiler works
without it
I had a similar problem when I ran make on my Solaris 8 box but I
decided to take another route. I installed SUSE 7.3 for SPARC and
everything is working great now.
Gene Parks
VIP Direct
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
19 matches
Mail list logo
