Re: Conversion to Version 2

2008-10-06 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, > No question about that. I read about all the new authentication > features and its amazing how anyone can keep up with all that stuff. > However, if converting my modules is going to be a big deal, I don't see > any real advantage. it 'it works for me, i cant see why I should upgrade

Re: Conversion to Version 2

2008-10-06 Thread tnt
>However, the bigger issue is for modules. The wiki >page is still completely oriented towards version 1 as I have never >tried version 2. What has to be changed with modules to use them with >version 2? I suspect that the wiki page will quickly lose its value >otherwise. > Nothing needs to be

Re: Conversion to Version 2

2008-10-06 Thread Doug Hardie
On Oct 6, 2008, at 01:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, No question about that. I read about all the new authentication features and its amazing how anyone can keep up with all that stuff. However, if converting my modules is going to be a big deal, I don't see any real advantage. it 'it

Re: Conversion to Version 2

2008-10-06 Thread Alan DeKok
Doug Hardie wrote: > Thats not that big a deal as for the basic stuff, the code is quite > straight forward. However, the bigger issue is for modules. The wiki > page is still completely oriented towards version 1 as I have never > tried version 2. What has to be changed with modules to use them

Some recent changes...

2008-10-06 Thread Alan DeKok
I've moved git head to using the latest libtool (2.2.4). This MAY cause issues, or it MAY solve problems that people have. There's really no way to tell until it's tested on a wide variety of systems. I've put some effort into fixing the "bind to privileged port" issues. It's possible to run

Re: Problem with EAP-TLS

2008-10-06 Thread Guk Victor
Message: 2 Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 12:34:08 +0100 From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Problem with EAP-TLS To: "FreeRadius users mailing list" Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Radius is working fine. Your problem is with NAS: .. >rad_

Error in the negotiations

2008-10-06 Thread Martin Silvero
This is the error when the user tries to connect seems an error of certificates but are well installed: thanks!!! Going to the next request Waking up in 2.9 seconds. rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host 10.0.31.40 port 1645, id=68, length=144 User-Name = "msilvero" Fram

Primary key in radacct table

2008-10-06 Thread Santiago Balaguer García
Hi, I am using a freeradius 1.1.7 + postgres since 3 years ago. The AAA service works fine, however my radacct table has sonetimes duplicate registers. I realize that it happens when a NAS does not have a realiable Internet conection, so NAS send the accounting packets several times. My

Re: Primary key in radacct table

2008-10-06 Thread Marinko Tarlac
You can do it and it will solve your problem but it can create small overhead because radius tries to write into database and it will be rejected. you will see this in your log files. Another idea is to change NAS or you can create cron script to delete duplicated entries. MT On Mon, Oct 6, 2008

RE: Dynamic Clients with FreeRADIUS

2008-10-06 Thread Johan Meiring
> > Johan Meiring wrote: > > Is the the "availibility of Nas-Identendifier" to the > virtual server thing?? > > No. Maybe in 2.1.2. > Hi Alan, Now that 2.1.1 is out, is it still on the cards for 2.1.2? If you could let me know when it has been comitted to git, I would love to test it. Th

RE: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread Jair Santos
Hi, I managed to successfully install with the default $ ./configure $ make $ make install When running the server with $ radiusd -X I got Unable to open file "/usr/local/etc/raddb/snmp.conf": No such file or directory Errors reading /usr/local/etc/raddb/radiusd.conf Th

RE: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread tnt
>When running the server with > > $ radiusd -X > >I got > >Unable to open file "/usr/local/etc/raddb/snmp.conf": No such file or >directory >Errors reading /usr/local/etc/raddb/radiusd.conf > > >The snmp.conf is not there and in my radiusd.conf there is > >snmp= no >$INCLUDE snmp.conf > >So my

RE: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread Jair Santos
I got it from cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/source checkout radiusd Isn't that the right one ? Jair Santos > -Original Message- > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] us.org] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 11:33 AM > To:

Re: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread Anders Holm
If you want to help develop FreeRADIUS, that's the spot. Otherwise, I'd personally recommend using the .tar.bz2 file that is linked on the front page of http://freeradius.org ... That's the actual release. CVS is probably whatever the folks are working on, which may or may not work. Have some memo

RE: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread tnt
>I got it from > >cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/source checkout radiusd > >Isn't that the right one ? > >Jair Santos > That look fine. snmp.conf should be in there. Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

RE: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread Jair Santos
Now I am confused. My first try was to download from http://freeradius.org. When making I got /home/jsantos8890/downloads/freeradius/freeradius-server-2.1.1/libtool --mode=link gcc -o radmin radmin.lo /usr/lib/libreadline.so /usr/lib/libtermcap.so /home/jsantos8890/downloads/freeradius/freeradi

RE: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread Jair Santos
I read somewhere that I'll have to enable it when configuring. I 've tried with-snmp, and enable-snmp but none worked. Jair Santos > -Original Message- > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] us.org] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 06, 200

RE: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread tnt
Is snmp.conf in downloaded files. If it is just copy it. Should be: /home/jsantos8890/downloads/freeradius/freeradius-server-2.1.1/raddb/snmp.conf Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP Dana 6/10/2008, "Jair Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> piše: >Now I am confused. > >My first try was to download from

RE: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread Jair Santos
Nope. It's not there :-( Won't it be generated on the fly IF I enable snmp in the config ? How can I do that? Jair Santos > -Original Message- > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] us.org] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 12:51

RE: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread Jair Santos
And it is not on the files downloaded from http://freeradius.org as well. Jair Santos > -Original Message- > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] us.org] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 12:51 PM > To: FreeRadius users mailing list

RE: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread Jair Santos
Searching the archives I have found this John Horne wrote: >Creating/updating files in /usr/local/etc/raddb >install: snmp.conf does not exist >find: /usr/local/etc/raddb/snmp.conf: No such file or directory > > It seems that Makefile has 'snmp.conf' listed as a file to be installed

RE: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread tnt
It's not. But neither is that include in radiusd.conf. You wouldn't be mixing versions? Attached is snmp.conf from 2.0.5. Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP Dana 6/10/2008, "Jair Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> piše: >And it is not on the files downloaded from http://freeradius.org as well. > > > >Ja

RE: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread Jair Santos
Thank you Ivan . I just copied the file to raddb in my downloaded files, config,. make,makeinstall. It ran smoothly. Jair Santos > -Original Message- > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] us.org] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, October 06, 200

RE: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread tnt
So, what version do you have now (radiusd -v). Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP Dana 6/10/2008, "Jair Santos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> piše: >Thank you Ivan . > >I just copied the file to raddb in my downloaded files, config,. >make,makeinstall. > >It ran smoothly. > >Jair Santos > > > > > > >>

RE: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread Jair Santos
radiusd: FreeRADIUS Version 2.0.6, for host x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, built on Oct 6 2008 at 12:55:06 Copyright (C) 1999-2008 The FreeRADIUS server project and contributors. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. You may redistribute copies of Free

Re: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, > > radiusd: FreeRADIUS Version 2.0.6, for host x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, built 2.0.6 ? well, thats not the latest available version 2.1.1 is the latest and the default config files dont mention snmp.conf at all. if you install ver older versions then you *will* come across wierd issues d

Re: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread John Dennis
Jair Santos wrote: radiusd: FreeRADIUS Version 2.0.6, for host x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, built Gee, I thought you were building and using 2.1.1 ;-) You need to be careful with where you install things and what your paths are. Looks to me like you've installed your latest in /usr/local/sbin

RE: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread Jair Santos
Well guys, let's clarify. I downloaded with cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/source checkout radiusd No doubt about that. I have no control about the files that are there. I would like to have the latest version, that is AFAIK 2.1.1. The point is that when I tried to download from www.free

Re: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread John Dennis
Jair Santos wrote: Well guys, let's clarify. I downloaded with cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/source checkout radiusd No doubt about that. I have no control about the files that are there. I would like to have the latest version, that is AFAIK 2.1.1. The point is that when I tried to

RE: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread Jair Santos
Can I just run this over my previous installation ? I usually don't like rpms. And this will work with my 64 bits OS ? If this is Fedora I believe it is 32 bits. thanks Jair Santos -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Dennis

RE: Problem with freeradius.org website

2008-10-06 Thread Frank Bulk
If the freeradius.org is a virtual site bound to that IP address, hitting the IP may not display the content you're looking for. Which is why putting it into /etc/hosts resolved your issue, because your web browser is sending an HTTP request with a virtual site's domain name, and then the web serv

Help with Framed-IP-Address attribute

2008-10-06 Thread Tchavdar Paskov
Hello everyone, i have  a very interesting/stubborn issue to deal with. Recently i installed  freeswitch  and compiled the radius module with it. The idea was to collect all CDRs in POstgres Database. Everything  looked ok untill i decided to examine the generated records:     Acct-Status-Ty

Re: Help with Framed-IP-Address attribute

2008-10-06 Thread Karl Auer
On Mon, 2008-10-06 at 21:18 -0700, Tchavdar Paskov wrote: > Framed-IP-Address = 46.50.57.49 > Framed-IP-Address = 46.50.57.49 is the record that drives me mad and > here is the reason. > my lab is running entirely on private network 192.168.1.0 . i'm not > connecting to the freeswitch f

Re: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread Alan DeKok
Jair Santos wrote: > I got it from > > cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/source checkout radiusd > > Isn't that the right one ? No. If you read the "download" web page, it says that development has moved to git.freeradius.org. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www

Re: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread Alan DeKok
Jair Santos wrote: > Well guys, let's clarify. You didn't click on the link for 2.1.1 on the main web page: freeradius.org. Instead, you clicked on the "download" link. You didn't click on the "tar" file link for 2.1.1 on that page, either. You didn't click on the "git.freeradius.org" link fo

Re: Newbie question

2008-10-06 Thread Alan DeKok
John Dennis wrote: > I'm not sure why you were having problems with the upstream spec file, > but you can use the src rpm from Fedora libreadline is available both as a 32-bit && 64-bit library. The build system is creating a 64-bit binary, but ld tries to link to the 32-bit version of libreadl

Re: Help with Framed-IP-Address attribute

2008-10-06 Thread Alan DeKok
Tchavdar Paskov wrote: > nothing interesting here you'll probably say./ i thought the same /. > Framed-IP-Address = 46.50.57.49 is the record that drives me mad and > here is the reason. Like EVERYTHING in RADIUS accounting, the accounting records are generated by the NAS. In this case, FreeSw

RE: Primary key in radacct table

2008-10-06 Thread Santiago Balaguer García
I have a script to delete duplicate entries and stale session. But the duplicate accounting records were created in real time, I have to create a trigger in the database to detect these entries or activate a exec in accounting module. Is the 'acctuniqueid' attribute unique in all database in