Re: Status counters

2008-12-21 Thread Alan DeKok
Anders Holm wrote: Ah, the missing piece emerges. This is probably what I was missing. My frustration is that I explained how it works. Rather than believing that explanation, you started arguing about the rationale behind the explanation. That wasn't necessary. Are you being

Re: [Wimax with Alcatel Base Station]

2008-12-21 Thread Thomas Fagart
Alan DeKok a écrit : Thomas Fagart wrote: 1. Using radmin and the debug and even after reading man unlang, i'm still not able to filter requests based on client IP (this is easier then I'll be able to get only requests coming from the BS) What have you tried? Why hasn't it worked?

Re: Status counters

2008-12-21 Thread Anders Holm
Alan, all I'm trying to do is talk things over. You take that as arguing. I have understood what you have stated. I'm just trying to tell you, it isn't as obvious always as you might think it is. Sure, for you it is easy, as you've even written the RFCs. Not everyone has the background

rlm_ldap and multiple ldap calls?

2008-12-21 Thread JR Mayberry
I'm not really sure if I'm doing this right, maybe someone can provide guidance. I have two problems a) how to structure my directory and b) how to do two lookups in rlm_ldap. But, effectively, LDAP is our authorization store and I'm proxying RADIUS to an RSA server for authentication only.

Re: rlm_ldap and multiple ldap calls?

2008-12-21 Thread Alan DeKok
JR Mayberry wrote: I'm not really sure if I'm doing this right, maybe someone can provide guidance. I have two problems a) how to structure my directory and b) how to do two lookups in rlm_ldap. The LDAP module isn't set up to do multiple lookups. So, I'm basically doing two ldap lookups.

Re: Status counters

2008-12-21 Thread Alan DeKok
Anders Holm wrote: all I'm trying to do is talk things over. You take that as arguing. Q: How does this work? A: It works like this. Q: I think it works like that. A: No, I said like this. In detail. Q: But I really think it works like that! A: Stop it. Q: Stop what? sigh I have understood