Re: wpa2-psk and radiusd possible?

2009-07-17 Thread Stefan Winter
Hi, Can you please provide some keywords or maybe links for that? Seems that i use wrong seach terms, because i found nothing real usable. Thanks! Sure: http://www.eduroam.org/downloads/docs/GN2-08-230-DJ5.1.5.3-eduroamCookbook.pdf (it applies to 802.1X setups in general, not exclusively

Leap + freeRADIUS + AD

2009-07-17 Thread John
Hi, We are using freeRADIUS-1.1.6 talk with AD. It can work if we use EAP-peap(mschap-v2). Now I want to use Leap in client. But got failed.  Can Leap + freeRADIUS + AD support in freeRADIUS-1.1.6 or new version?   Thanks. John

Re: Leap + freeRADIUS + AD

2009-07-17 Thread Alan DeKok
John wrote: Hi, We are using freeRADIUS-1.1.6 talk with AD. It can work if we use EAP-peap(mschap-v2). Now I want to use Leap in client. But got failed. Can Leap + freeRADIUS + AD support in freeRADIUS-1.1.6 or new version? LEAP requires that the access points support LEAP. They don't.

Re: Error: Thread 1 failed waiting for semaphore: Invalid argument: Exiting

2009-07-17 Thread Alan DeKok
Tim Gustafson wrote: I've had a FreeRADIUS 2.1.3 server running on FreeBSD 7.1 for a few months now. I logged in today to add a new group to my users file, and then re-started the RADIUS daemon. After re-starting, I'm getting this in my error log: Info: Ready to process requests.

Re: how to get connection with server

2009-07-17 Thread Steven Carr
On 17/7/09 05:54, shivashankar wrote: i installed freeradius 2.1.6 on solaris10. i am unable to start the server.when ever i type the radiusd -X it is saying command not found. plz help me It will have installed it to /usr/local If you want to run it from wherever you are add

Maximum number of instances of a package already met message while using pkgadd

2009-07-17 Thread shivashankar
hi, while i am running pkgadd -d gcc-3.2* showing Maximum number of instances of a package already met message while using pkgadd thax for advance -- View this message in context:

radiusd -X problem

2009-07-17 Thread shivashankar
hi, when i run freeradius in solaris10 i am facing below problem miboss3# /usr/local/sbin/radiusd -x ld.so.1: radiusd: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory Killed -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/radiusd--X-problem-tp24532174p24532174.html Sent

Re: Maximum number of instances of a package already met message while using pkgadd

2009-07-17 Thread Ivan Kalik
while i am running pkgadd -d gcc-3.2* showing Maximum number of instances of a package already met message while using pkgadd Wrong list. Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Maximum number of instances of a package already met message while using pkgadd

2009-07-17 Thread Alan DeKok
shivashankar wrote: hi, while i am running pkgadd -d gcc-3.2* showing Maximum number of instances of a package already met message while using pkgadd You are asking Solaris questions on the FreeRADIUS list. Stop it. The problems that you are running into have

Re: radiusd -X problem

2009-07-17 Thread Ivan Kalik
when i run freeradius in solaris10 i am facing below problem miboss3# /usr/local/sbin/radiusd -x ld.so.1: radiusd: fatal: libgcc_s.so.1: open failed: No such file or directory Killed Read FAQ. Entry is abot mysql but it applies to any library. Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP - List

Re: Robust Authentication Proxying

2009-07-17 Thread Alan DeKok
Philip Molter wrote: I have left it in as a configurable option. I would rather someone not upgrade their freeradius codebase with this patch and find that the behavior they have come to rely on has changed. While I am concerned about changing behavior, that reject on response_window

Re: radius.log permissions issue

2009-07-17 Thread Alan DeKok
John Dennis wrote: FWIW, in our RPM's we force the creation of the radius.log file with ownership radiusd:radiusd at installation time before the server even runs. This should also be in the /etc/init.d/radiusd script. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See

Re: radius.log permissions issue

2009-07-17 Thread Alan DeKok
Philip Molter wrote: Attached is a patch that fixes the issue. Given the way that freeradius checks for the ability to write to the logfile, it should perform like the latter (in my testing, it does exactly that). The patch does a couple of things: 1) properly handles setuid changes in

radiusd -f flag - how it affects custom freeradius module

2009-07-17 Thread George Chelidze
Hello, Recently I have developed a custom module for freeradius 2.1.6 following http://wiki.freeradius.org/Modules2 document. The purpose of this module is to translate authorization requests to Tibco Rendezvous messages (Commercial software - Message Bus), send them to some external application,

chase_referrals and rebind in 2.1.6

2009-07-17 Thread Wegener, Norbert
I am having some problems with an AD and FreeRADIUS. rlm_ldap debug lets me assume that there might be a relation to chase_referrals and rebind. According to the Changelog there have been changes regarding this in 2.1.6: Added chase_referrals and rebind configuration to rlm_ldap. This helps

Re: chase_referrals and rebind in 2.1.6

2009-07-17 Thread Alan DeKok
Wegener, Norbert wrote: I am having some problems with an AD and FreeRADIUS. rlm_ldap debug lets me assume that there might be a relation to chase_referrals and rebind. According to the Changelog there have been changes regarding this in 2.1.6: Added chase_referrals and rebind

Re: Robust Authentication Proxying

2009-07-17 Thread Philip Molter
Alan DeKok wrote: c) response_window being hit now does nothing other than start the zombie period. The first request that causes this is NOT rejected. The old behavior can still be configured if desired. How does this change affect accounting handling? Does the request now fail over

Re: radius.log permissions issue

2009-07-17 Thread Philip Molter
Alan DeKok wrote: Philip Molter wrote: Attached is a patch that fixes the issue. Given the way that freeradius checks for the ability to write to the logfile, it should perform like the latter (in my testing, it does exactly that). The patch does a couple of things: 1) properly handles