Hi guys,
Having just come from a meeting, I've not actually had a chance to do any
research myself, and hoped to lean on the community a little.
A concern was put forward regarding password policies for policies stored in
a radius server. Now, policies like "Must be 8 characters" and "must have 2
Let me ask something about attr_rewrite in order to give the
possibility to work with my 6 APs, and to do a rewrite of MAC to
EAP-PEAP authentication.
Would it be possible to write in radius.conf and default files the
following, avoiding many entries in the hints file?
Scenario: AP1
Any news on that issue? How can I make any attention from developers
to this issue?
Thanks in advance!
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 2:52 AM, Alexandr Kovalenko
wrote:
> UP
>
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Alexandr
> Kovalenko wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> It has been stated in release notes for FR 2.1.
John Center wrote:
> Hi Alan - BTW, are you going to release your 2.x upgrade guide? -John
At this time, it only available via a support contract
http://networkradius.com/support/
The reason is simple: I already give a lot away for free. I'm writing
the book (it will be done real s
Salim Engin wrote:
> 1- From its customer documentation;
>
> General
> Vendor ID 637 is used for 7302 ISAM.
> The vendor specific attribute type has a length of two bytes long where
> the highest
> byte is the project ID and the lowest byte is the project specific
> attribute ID.
> The project ID
Mathieu Agopian wrote:
> It is indeed what we've experienced with our tests: a simple "echo
> 'Auth-Type := Accept'" would take up to 100ms (more) than a "return 3"
> in perl or in python.
Well... I'm not sure what to say about that. Try using valgrind to
profile memory usage.
> that does inde
Ok, it works, but a new problem emerged
I have 6 AP´s. One of them send the MAC in the following format:
00-18-E7-41-AD-C2. The others send 0018e741adc2... Here the letters
are in lowercase and if changed to uppercase the authentication fails
from 5 AP´s.
What must I do in radcheck table to wo
Thor Spruyt wrote:
> Just wondering... i have an empty users file, and i use rlm_sql only to fetch
> the Cleartext-Password in the authorize section, like this:
> SELECT 1,username,'Cleartext-Password',password,':=' FROM account WHERE
> username='thor'
>
> I then get this message in the debuggi
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 23:28 +0100, Alexander Clouter wrote:
> In my system, I use the following to RFCese the incoming
> Calling-Station-ID:
>
> if ( "%{request:Calling-Station-Id}" =~
> /^([0-9a-f]{2}).?([0-9a-f]{2}).?([0-9a-f]{2}).?([0-9a-f]{2}).?([0-9a-f]{2}).?([0-9a-f]{2})$/i
> ) {
>
Alan DeKok wrote:
>
> Alexander Clouter wrote:
>
>> I *strongly* recommend you do not mix user and host authentication into
>> one which looks like what you are slipping into doing. Computers can
>> have multiple users (think of a UNIX box SSHed into), they might have an
>> administrative enti
Ben Jencks wrote:
>
> On Sep 12, 2009, at 18:21, Alexander Clouter wrote:
>
>> Ben Jencks wrote:
>>>
>> I *strongly* recommend you do not mix user and host authentication
>> into one which looks like what you are slipping into doing.
>> Computers can have multiple users (think of a UNIX box S
Alexander Clouter wrote:
> I *strongly* recommend you do not mix user and host authentication into
> one which looks like what you are slipping into doing. Computers can
> have multiple users (think of a UNIX box SSHed into), they might have an
> administrative entity which is identifiable by t
12 matches
Mail list logo
