Hi *,
i try to get a better grip in understanding the virtual server for inner eap
tunnel.
Please forgive if any of the following statements represents misunderstanding
of concepts from my side.
Which of the following statements describe the inner tunnel virtual server
for EAP wrong / correct ?
Please don't send the same message over and over again. It's rude, and
will discourage others from even trying to help you.
I'm really sorry.
Try https://github.com/alandekok/freeradius-server/blob/v2.1.x/raddb/proxy.conf
, look for src_ipaddr
If your version doesn't support that option then u
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Yusuke SAKAMOTO wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'm using FreeRADIUS 2.1.10 on FreeBSD.
> May I ask about the freeradius's socket creation behavior?
Please don't send the same message over and over again. It's rude, and
will discourage others from even trying to help you.
>
I'm so sorry.
I sent duplicate mails because I had a mis-configuration in my
mail client.
Please ignore the duplicate ones. I'm really sorry...
(2011/04/24 21:04), Yusuke SAKAMOTO wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'm using FreeRADIUS 2.1.10 on FreeBSD.
> May I ask about the freeradius's socket creation be
Hi all.
I'm using FreeRADIUS 2.1.10 on FreeBSD.
May I ask about the freeradius's socket creation behavior?
I set up the following environment, and I use FreeRADIUS as a
radius proxy server. The host has two IP addresses (X.X.X.X
and X.X.X.Y), but FreeRADIUS is running only on X.X.X.X
because I st
Hi all.
I'm using FreeRADIUS 2.1.10 on FreeBSD.
May I ask about the freeradius's socket creation behavior?
I set up the following environment, and I use FreeRADIUS as a
radius proxy server. The host has two IP addresses (X.X.X.X
and X.X.X.Y), but FreeRADIUS is running only on X.X.X.X
because I st
Hi all.
I'm using FreeRADIUS 2.1.10 on FreeBSD.
May I ask about the freeradius's socket creation behavior?
I set up the following environment, and I use FreeRADIUS as a
radius proxy server. The host has two IP addresses (X.X.X.X
and X.X.X.Y), but FreeRADIUS is running only on X.X.X.X
because I st
On 04/24/2011 12:48 AM, Thomas Smith wrote:
While Samba 3.5 and Likewise 6 fixed the problems authenticating
against Win2k8r2, Likewise removed support for Samba/Winbind in their
6.x series product (they included full support for Samba/Winbind in
their 5.x series product)--they now use their own
8 matches
Mail list logo