On 15/10/2011 01:18, OzSpots - Carl Sawers wrote:
Hi All, I have searched high and low for a Radacct Terminate cause
description for Freeradius, the terminate cause states “Lost-Session” ,
anyone know what it refers too?
Please set a subject when posting to a mailing list.
http://freeradius.or
Check your NAS' documentation. The NAS sends that to FreeRADIUS to log.
Michael
--
Michael J. Hartwick, VE3SLQ hartw...@hartwick.com
Hartwick Communications Consulting (519) 396-7
Hi All, I have searched high and low for a Radacct Terminate cause
description for Freeradius, the terminate cause states "Lost-Session" ,
anyone know what it refers too?
Regards
Carl
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Guillaume Sigui wrote:
> Ok, sorry. I explain below with more details:
Guillaume, let me put this another way.
Most of the things you've wrote is irrelevant to this list.
This list is freeradius mailing list. Not alcatel list, not mysql
list, not some support fo
I've searched for this sort of posting, but found issues unrelated that
responded to my search string, so I decided to post it here.
OK, currently I have Radius authenticating LDAP users via PAP. Works great.
Imagine I want to store x509 certificate data (specifically a client
certificate) in
I've got a handful of windows clients. I'm most concerned about the
Windows 7 machines, but there are a few Vista, and even an XP client. I
want to deploy "Machine account certificates" for wifi authentication,
so machines will be able to connect to the network BEFORE the user logs
on (mainly
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
>
>> If you keep this up, I'll unsubscribe nabble.com, too. Very little
>> of anything worthwhile comes from there.
>
> Really though. The majority of the posts from nabble are just idiotic.
> There's something about actually taking the time to subscribe to the
> ma
On 14/10/2011 16:13, Martin Ubank wrote:
Here’s the full output from ‘radiusd –X’:
The bit at the top that tells us what radiusd has read from the config
files is missing.
It's not executing ntlm_auth by the looks of what you posted, so you need
to look at why. The first bit of radiusd -X w
Ok, sorry. I explain below with more details:
-
DESCRIPTION OF WORKLOAD PROBLEM WITH FREERADIUS PLATFORM
I- OBJECTIVES
It was a project that was im
Dale Grice wrote:
> Yes, I did indent the reply line. Found that out the hard way. I
> indented the user line also. I'll take out the user name line indent and
> try that.
Read "man users", or the comments at the top of the "users" file, or
the examples in the "user" file.
This is documented
On 14 Oct 2011, at 15:33, Mike Diggins wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2011, Alan DeKok wrote:
>
>> Mike Diggins wrote:
>>> Accounting feature on the WLAN controllers (for now), I noticed that a
>>> similar failure is a happening on the Authentication side. Some
>>> authentication requests proxied to
>
> I can see from the 'radiusd -X' output that FreeRadius is not using MS-CHAP
> correctly:
>
>
> [eap] processing type mschapv2
> [mschapv2] +- entering group MS-CHAP {...}
> [mschap] No Cleartext-Password configured. Cannot create LM-Password.
> [mschap] No Cleartext-Password configured.
On 14 Oct 2011, at 16:41, Alan DeKok wrote:
> siguillaume wrote:
>> Ok, thanks.
>> I give more details in the files attached.
> ...
>> *DESCRIPTION OF WORKLOAD PROBLEM WITH FREERADIUS.pdf* (291K) Download
>> Attachment
>
> I wish you were joking, but I'm sure you're not.
>
> As a hint, postin
siguillaume wrote:
> Ok, thanks.
> I give more details in the files attached.
...
> *DESCRIPTION OF WORKLOAD PROBLEM WITH FREERADIUS.pdf* (291K) Download
> Attachment
I wish you were joking, but I'm sure you're not.
As a hint, posting PDFs is rude. *NO ONE* else is doing it.
Go read the d
I've been following the FreeRadius Deployment guide
http://deployingradius.com/documents/configuration/active_directory.html
The following software is installed on a Centos 6 VM:
-Samba 3.5.4, Freeradius 2.1.9, wpa_supplicant-0.7.3, gcc v4.4.4-13,
openssl, winbind.
I successfully perfo
On Fri, 14 Oct 2011, Alan DeKok wrote:
Mike Diggins wrote:
Accounting feature on the WLAN controllers (for now), I noticed that a
similar failure is a happening on the Authentication side. Some
authentication requests proxied to other radius servers (via Eduroam)
are either failing or taking a
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Alan Buxey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >What startup script in Debian starts freeradius? I would like to
> add
> >the -X option to it.
>
> why? just run 'radiusd -X' - as the main service script isnt designed
> to be run in foreground (it would be a standard
Ok, thanks.
I give more details in the files attached.
Guillaume Sigui
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:53:16 -0700
From: ml-node+s1045715n4901160...@n5.nabble.com
To: gsi...@live.fr
Subject: Re: Workload in freeradius? platform
Guillaume Sigui wrote:
> What is going slow?
> Answer: The re
Zeus V Panchenko wrote:
> i was long time struggling the problem with this warning, and the
> cause was *not* in incompatibility of certificates at all (I was
> writing that in thread "EAP-TLS + Symbian = weird behavior")
>
> the cause was MTU issue, and it is due to it the last response from
> cl
Hi,
I'd like to offer to add some details to this warning or to mention
the details somewhere else
WARNING:
!!
WARNING: !! EAP session for state 0x6097435463935ad2 did not finish!
WARNING: !! Please read http://wiki.freeradius.or
hi,
gary (gary.y...@browan.com) [11.10.13 09:21] wrote:
> Hi All
> I am trying to set up 802.1x with EAP PEAP/TTLS method by using intel PROSset
> client tool with the PC.
> Sometimes authentication success but mostly it fail.
> Log attached could someone give me some direction?thanks a lot.
>
finally the cause was found!
in my case it was MTU, the default value for ethernet and ADSL was not
allowing for the client responce with certificate to get radius side
after decreasing mtu to 1350 i finally got every mobile device in my
network authenticated
Zeus V Panchenko (z...@ibs.dn.ua
I think that I have detected an error. In radiusd.conf I had two listeners, I
have commented the second listener (appears in the last post):
listen {
type = auth
ipaddr = *
port = 0
}
listen {
ipaddr = *
port = 0
type = acct
}
This is corr
Hi,
Yes I have written more. I have modified proxy.conf file with home_servers
configuration. This is its content:
proxy server {
default_fallback = no
}
home_server radiusa {
type = auth+acct
ipaddr = 192.168.1.129
port = 1812
secret = testing
24 matches
Mail list logo
