Re: redundant load balancing and mschap

2012-08-25 Thread Phil Mayers
On 08/24/2012 11:53 PM, McNutt, Justin M. wrote: The underlying problem is that I have four production RADIUS servers that all seem to choose the same domain controller, which is not only a lot of load, but it's a bad idea in terms of fault tolerance. I agree about the fault tolerance. In my

Re: Radius MONITOR option

2012-08-25 Thread Ethan Whitt
The load balancer sends the health-check on udp/1813 with only Monitor in the payload (per a sniffer capture). From my understanding - this health-check is not a properly formatted radius packet? The expected response is the exact same - a packet from udp/1813 with only Monitor in the payload.

Re: Radius MONITOR option

2012-08-25 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
On 25 Aug 2012, at 21:36, Ethan Whitt ethan.l.wh...@gmail.com wrote: The load balancer sends the health-check on udp/1813 with only Monitor in the payload (per a sniffer capture). From my understanding - this health-check is not a properly formatted radius packet? The expected response is

Re: Radius MONITOR option

2012-08-25 Thread Alan Buxey
Ask them when they are going to implement status-server Alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html