Thanks Alan. Will do that.
-Latha.
--- On Thu, 8/12/10, Alan DeKok wrote:
From: Alan DeKok
Subject: Re: Vendor Specific Attributes
To: "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Date: Thursday, August 12, 2010, 12:40 PM
Latha Krishnamurthi wrote:
>
> Thanks for the prompt reply
, then can I do it without releasing a new code ?
Thanks,
Latha.
--- On Thu, 8/12/10, Alan DeKok wrote:
From: Alan DeKok
Subject: Re: Vendor Specific Attributes
To: "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Date: Thursday, August 12, 2010, 1:47 AM
Latha Krishnamurthi wrote:
> Is there a way
Hi,
Is there a way to add vendor specific attributes to the RADIUS response without
adding the vendor to the dictionary.
If the vendor is part of the dictionary, then I use pairmake with the attribute
name as in the dictionary and this works.
pairmake("Cisco-AVpair", "", T_OP_SET);
Hi,
I am using freeradius 2.1.3.
Is there a way in freeradius to forward the requests to all the configured
realms one after the other, if it gets rejected say for null or default realms
??
I did not find anything like that in the configuration ?
Any response is grately appreciated.
Th
This is very clear.Thanks.
--- On Mon, 2/22/10, Doug Hardie wrote:
From: Doug Hardie
Subject: Re: modules instantiation
To: "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Date: Monday, February 22, 2010, 10:56 PM
I tried to correct the wiki's description but was not able to do so. I can log
in fine and
Thankyou will try that.
--- On Fri, 2/19/10, Alan DeKok wrote:
From: Alan DeKok
Subject: Re: modules instantiation
To: "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Date: Friday, February 19, 2010, 6:07 PM
Latha Krishnamurthi wrote:
> I see that a new instance is getting created when the
_ldap does something similar ?)
Thanks in advance
LK
--- On Fri, 2/19/10, Doug Hardie wrote:
From: Doug Hardie
Subject: Re: modules instantiation
To: "FreeRadius users mailing list"
Date: Friday, February 19, 2010, 3:49 PM
On 19 February 2010, at 15:24, Latha Krishnamurthi wrote
Hi,
I am using the free radius 2.1.3. I have a module rlm_xxx and have initialized
it as thread safe. I have configured the start_servers as 3. The issue I am
having is as follows.
I see that a new instance is getting created when the first one is busy
handling a request. (I do this this b
8 matches
Mail list logo
