Re: EAP-Handshakes: every reply runs the full authorize-section

i forgot: thanks for the info - Original Message - From: "Arran Cudbard-Bell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "FreeRadius users mailing list" Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 10:16 AM Subject: Re: EAP-Handshakes: every reply runs the full authorize-section > Rainer B

EAP-Handshakes: every reply runs the full authorize-section

cause that machinenames are always unknown to us. What we have to check are the inner-Tunnel - credentials) kind regards Rainer Brinkmann Network-Management University-Clinicum Hamburg / Germany -- Pflichtangaben gemäß Gesetz über elektronische Handelsregister und Genossenschaftsregister

basic handling of multiple EAP-Methods by freerad

Method to use, when there are many enabled. e.g. on a cisco-Radius, that runs with enabled PEAP and TLS, but there's no special attribute defined to control that thanks for reply, Rainer Brinkmann University-Clinicum Hamburg / Germany - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See

basic handling of multiple EAP-Methods by freerad

Method to use, when there are many enabled. e.g. on a cisco-Radius, that runs with enabled PEAP and TLS, but there's no special attribute defined to control that thanks for reply, Rainer Brinkmann University-Clinicum Hamburg / Germany - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See

LDAP-Authentication based on CHAP

one-directioned (hashed)". So, only a "simple bind" is ok. But if LDAP can run a chap-based password-check by retrieving a password: is the LDAP-Protocol (v3) basically capable of doing this? Hamburg/Germany, Rainer Brinkmann - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html