On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 at 22:03, Phil Mayers opined:
PM:Carefully examine the two entries on line 1 and 172, determine what's
PM:different, examine the unredacted data in the packets, and correct it.
hi phil - thanks for the advice, i figured out that placement of the
$INCLUDE statement (and
On Tue, 24 Sep 2013 at 10:36, Alan DeKok opined:
AD: It also contradicts your previous messages. You claimed you put the
AD:users file entry at line one of the file. But now you talk about a
AD:$INCLUDE statement.
AD:
AD: So... which is it?
hi alan - well, i did both. at first the
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 at 13:31, John Dennis opined:
JD:You still haven't sent the full debug.
hi john - thanks for your reply. i sent the output from running radiusd
-X, are you saying i need to run -Xxx and send that instead?
or are you looking for the startup output as well? i only included
hi all - i've recently tried upgrading from v1 to v2. on a centos 6.4 box
w/ all latest updates, i installed freeradius v2, added one username and
password to /etc/raddb/users:
test Cleartext-Password := testing
and the radtest command-line authentication works. i then added one
client
eOn Mon, 23 Sep 2013 at 17:52, Phil Mayers opined:
PM:It's difficult to say, because the debug you sent has all the useful
PM:bits trimmed out - like the original packet, and the full module
PM:processing chain.
hi phil - ok, here's the full debug for a successful request:
rad_recv:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 at 18:49, Rui Ribeiro opined:
RR:Your not crazy for sure. The problem authenticating with Windows boxen
RR:is that they only support MSCHAPv2… kudos to Microsoft.
hi rui - thanks for that, although my family and co workers may disagree!
according to this wiki faq entry:
On Mon, 23 Sep 2013 at 14:42, John Dennis opined:
JD:You have all the information you need to debug your problem. It does
JD:require reading the debug output carefully. But you should really try
JD:to do that yourself first. As a said earlier, verify you're reading the
JD:exact same users file
7 matches
Mail list logo
