Re: [rad] Re: Change of Authorization (RFC 3576 / 5176)

2009-06-11 Thread Charles Gregory
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: If I'm reading Alan's post correctly, freeradius supports CoA packets, but you need to write your own rule/policy to send it. For over-bandwidth scenario, the rule should be while examining interim-update acct packets... I've never heard of these...

Re: [rad] Re: Change of Authorization (RFC 3576 / 5176)

2009-06-11 Thread Ivan Kalik
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: If I'm reading Alan's post correctly, freeradius supports CoA packets, but you need to write your own rule/policy to send it. For over-bandwidth scenario, the rule should be while examining interim-update acct packets... I've never heard of

Re: [rad] Re: Change of Authorization (RFC 3576 / 5176)

2009-06-11 Thread Charles Gregory
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Ivan Kalik wrote: http://freeradius.org/rfc/rfc2869.html#Acct-Interim-Interval Interesting, but I agree I don't like the bandwidth implications. I would only have used them if they were already occuring by default. You would normaly use radius *client* to send CoA for