Sorry for that, I havent check the config output that's my fault. But 2.1.11
was working fine. Nevermind 2.1.12 is working now.
-
Deniz AYDIN
Senior Network Engineer
--
View this message in context:
http://freeradius.1045715.n5.nabble.com/2-1-12-potential-problem-tp4811959p4822190.html
Sent
On 20/09/2011 11:38, denizaydin wrote:
I can not see its giving this error while starting. Do I have to change
installation directory or the library dirctory in the radiusd.conf?
[10:15:39.9] gmake[11]: Entering directory
`/home/network/Downloads/freeradius-server-2.1.12/src/modules/rlm_sql/driv
I can not see its giving this error while starting. Do I have to change
installation directory or the library dirctory in the radiusd.conf?
[10:15:39.9] gmake[11]: Entering directory
`/home/network/Downloads/freeradius-server-2.1.12/src/modules/rlm_sql/drivers/rlm_sql_postgresql'
[10:15:39.9] if
denizaydin wrote:
> Hi,
> I have upgraded to version 2.1.12 but its givin error for
> rlm_sql_postgresql. (For solving the problem on post "Reverting
> Accept-Reject to Access-Accept".
...
> Could not link driver rlm_sql_postgresql: rlm_sql_postgresql.so: cannot open
> shared object file: No such f
Hi,
I have upgraded to version 2.1.12 but its givin error for
rlm_sql_postgresql. (For solving the problem on post "Reverting
Accept-Reject to Access-Accept".
radiusd -X
FreeRADIUS Version 2.1.12, for host i686-pc-linux-gnu, built on Sep 19 2011
at 17:42:41
Copyright (C) 1999-2009 The FreeRADIUS s
James J J Hooper wrote:
> This doesn't seem to have reached github yet.
Weird. Re-done.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
On 17/09/2011 01:56, Alan DeKok wrote:
James J J Hooper wrote:
Above won't work since:
https://github.com/alandekok/freeradius-server/commit/1a00da32c13fb979e11748250da469c7ac4474a8
-James
https://github.com/alandekok/freeradius-server/commit/1a00da
In fact this dictionary change breaks othe
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> Is it commit 68593c7 ?
637690d7bd6
> I can't figure out from reading the code, does the fix mean setting
> Auth-Type:=Accept will still work?
The commit above reverted the change which broke the server.
Everything will still work as before.
Alan DeKok.
-
List inf
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> James J J Hooper wrote:
>>> Above won't work since:
>>> https://github.com/alandekok/freeradius-server/commit/1a00da32c13fb979e11748250da469c7ac4474a8
>>>
>>>
>>> -James
>>
>> https://github.com/alandekok/freeradius-server/commit/1a00da
>> In fa
James J J Hooper wrote:
>> Above won't work since:
>> https://github.com/alandekok/freeradius-server/commit/1a00da32c13fb979e11748250da469c7ac4474a8
>>
>>
>> -James
>
> https://github.com/alandekok/freeradius-server/commit/1a00da
> In fact this dictionary change breaks other stuff too, e.g. below:
Don't do that.
Instead, don't reject the in the first place. For example:
authorize {
...
sql
if (notfound) {
update control {
Auth-Type := Accept
}
}
}
Above won't work since:
https://github.com/alandekok/freeradius-server/commit/1a00da32c13fb979e11748250da469c7ac4474a8
-James
https://g
11 matches
Mail list logo
