Re: Allowing Access via 'users' when LDAP fails

2010-02-01 Thread Amaru Netapshaak
From: Alan Buxey a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Sent: Sun, January 31, 2010 12:16:17 PM Subject: Re: Allowing Access via 'users' when LDAP fails Hi, what switches? with Cisco you can use

Re: Allowing Access via 'users' when LDAP fails

2010-02-01 Thread Amaru Netapshaak
From: Fajar A. Nugraha fa...@fajar.net To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Sent: Sun, January 31, 2010 11:43:20 AM Subject: Re: Allowing Access via 'users' when LDAP fails On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Amaru Netapshaak

Re: Allowing Access via 'users' when LDAP fails

2010-02-01 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, I'm using Cisco 3560G switches. If a client currently doesnt send EAPOL packets to the switch, the 'guest vlan' works perfectly. However, my clients ARE dot1x capable, and DO send EAPOL packets to the switch and that makes the switchport stay unavailable for too long while the switch

Re: Allowing Access via 'users' when LDAP fails

2010-02-01 Thread Amaru Netapshaak
From: Alan Buxey a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Sent: Mon, February 1, 2010 9:51:42 AM Subject: Re: Allowing Access via 'users' when LDAP fails Hi, I'm using Cisco 3560G switches. If a client

Re: Allowing Access via 'users' when LDAP fails

2010-02-01 Thread schilling
list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Sent: Mon, February 1, 2010 9:51:42 AM Subject: Re: Allowing Access via 'users' when LDAP fails Hi, I'm using Cisco 3560G switches.  If a client currently doesnt send EAPOL packets to the switch, the 'guest vlan' works perfectly. However, my clients

Re: Allowing Access via 'users' when LDAP fails

2010-02-01 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 10:50 PM, Amaru Netapshaak postfix_am...@yahoo.com wrote: Anyway, if you still need accept all, Alan's example should work. Put something like this on authorize section         ldap         if (notfound) {                 update control {                        

Re: Allowing Access via 'users' when LDAP fails

2010-01-31 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Amaru Netapshaak postfix_am...@yahoo.com wrote: Hello, I've got FreeRADIUS querying an OpenLDAP server successfully. Users can login and their appropriate VLAN information is returned and everythings great.  Right now, if a user isnt found in the LDAP

Re: Allowing Access via 'users' when LDAP fails

2010-01-31 Thread Amaru Netapshaak
From: Fajar A. Nugraha fa...@fajar.net To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Sent: Sun, January 31, 2010 7:20:15 AM Subject: Re: Allowing Access via 'users' when LDAP fails On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:12 AM, Amaru Netapshaak

Re: Allowing Access via 'users' when LDAP fails

2010-01-31 Thread Fajar A. Nugraha
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Amaru Netapshaak postfix_am...@yahoo.com wrote: I need a port to come up IMMEDIATELY on the restricted-vlan, providing my clients with a DHCP-assigned address, and then once they log in, their appropriate VLAN info is found in LDAP via FreeRADIUS and then the

Re: Allowing Access via 'users' when LDAP fails

2010-01-31 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, what switches? with Cisco you can use various fallthroughs - and you can ensure that even the non 802.1X clients are catered for MAB will allow you to send request to RADIUS server and then its your policy that matters.. eg eg any MAC address, returns an ACCEPT but with a VLAN attribute.

Re: Allowing Access via 'users' when LDAP fails

2010-01-29 Thread Amaru Netapshaak
From: Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Sent: Thu, January 28, 2010 1:00:47 AM Subject: Re: Allowing Access via 'users' when LDAP fails Amaru Netapshaak wrote: Right now, if a user

Allowing Access via 'users' when LDAP fails

2010-01-27 Thread Amaru Netapshaak
Hello, I've got FreeRADIUS querying an OpenLDAP server successfully. Users can login and their appropriate VLAN information is returned and everythings great.  Right now, if a user isnt found in the LDAP database, a reject is returned to the switch and the port goes offline. What I'd rather

Re: Allowing Access via 'users' when LDAP fails

2010-01-27 Thread Alan DeKok
Amaru Netapshaak wrote: Right now, if a user isnt found in the LDAP database, a reject is returned to the switch and the port goes offline. What I'd rather have,is RADIUS reply with a standard response (if the LDAP auth fails). See doc/configurable_failover for over-riding return codes.