]
s.org
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
reeradius.org] On Behalf Of John Dennis
Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 3:56 PM
To: FreeRadius users mailing list
Subject: Building Installing on Red Hat Systems (Was: Make
error - Solved)
There has been a fair amount of confusion over how to get
On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:44:08AM -0800, J Santos wrote:
I 've followed the faq instructions and I have now the following packages
available.
freeradius-2.1.1-7.x86_64.rpmfreeradius-perl-2.1.1-7.x86_64.rpm
freeradius-devel-2.1.1-7.x86_64.rpm
Install the freeradius-libs first.
rpm -ivh freeradius-2.1.1-7.x86_64.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
libfreeradius-eap-2.1.1.so()(64bit) is needed by
freeradius-2.1.1-7.x86_64
libfreeradius-radius-2.1.1.so()(64bit) is needed by
freeradius-2.1.1-7.x86_64
-
List
Hi,
There has been a fair amount of confusion over how to get FreeRADIUS
packages for Fedora, RHEL, and CentOS, how to perform a build if a
pre-built package is not available, and how to do some basic maintenance
tasks.
it would help immensely if Fedora, RHEL, CentOS et al actually
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 10:28:40AM +0100, Alan DeKok wrote:
John Dennis wrote:
So I've created a new FreeRADIUS wiki page with Red Hat specific
information:
http://wiki.freeradius.org/Red_Hat_FAQ
Thanks. I've added a file redhat/README telling people to please go
read that
Alan DeKok wrote:
Thanks. I've added a file redhat/README telling people to please go
read that document.
You're welcome. It's a good start and I hope it helps. FWIW we try to
make sure the thousands of software packages in our distributions are
well supported, it can be a daunting
J Santos wrote:
Thank you Dennis,
It is a very, very useful document.
Checking both distros RHEL and CentOS there are only old packages available
(version 1.1.3) and only i386.
I have a rpm already built but it is not properly working.
Based on what you described in the doc I better
Hi,
The main download page on freeradius.org has a link to:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=298
Which has RPMs of recent versions. But who reads the web page?
your typical rh/fed/centos user would never visit the homepage
of the program/utility they are
Jos Vos wrote:
RHEL (and thus CentOS) are conservative enterprise distros and thus
do *not* include the newest (bleeding edge) release of everything
as soon as it comes out. They want to stay compatible through the
7 (!) years of support time. This is how it is and this is, in
principle, a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it would help immensely if Fedora, RHEL, CentOS et al actually
supplied up to date version of FreeRADIUS - ie at least 2.0.5
(if not 2.1.1 !) rather than the historic 1.1.x (or even 1.0.x!)
The main download page on freeradius.org has a link to:
John Dennis wrote:
There has been a fair amount of confusion over how to get FreeRADIUS
packages for Fedora, RHEL, and CentOS, how to perform a build if a
pre-built package is not available, and how to do some basic maintenance
tasks.
So I've created a new FreeRADIUS wiki page with Red Hat
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 10:47:08AM +0100, Alan DeKok wrote:
It should be easier for *new* installs to use 2.x. Otherwise, they
install the latest RHEL version, and then get told to upgrade.
This is unrealistic. How should RH maintain a sliding base? And what
does RHEL5 mean if the version
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:18:25AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it would help immensely if Fedora, RHEL, CentOS et al actually
supplied up to date version of FreeRADIUS - ie at least 2.0.5
(if not 2.1.1 !) rather than the historic 1.1.x (or even 1.0.x!)
if such a version was available
Jos Vos wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 09:18:25AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it would help immensely if Fedora, RHEL, CentOS et al actually
supplied up to date version of FreeRADIUS - ie at least 2.0.5
(if not 2.1.1 !) rather than the historic 1.1.x (or even 1.0.x!)
if such a version
John Dennis wrote:
Alan DeKok wrote:
Thanks. I've added a file redhat/README telling people to please go
read that document.
You're welcome. It's a good start and I hope it helps. FWIW we try to
make sure the thousands of software packages in our distributions are
well supported, it
Jos Vos wrote:
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 10:47:08AM +0100, Alan DeKok wrote:
It should be easier for *new* installs to use 2.x. Otherwise, they
install the latest RHEL version, and then get told to upgrade.
This is unrealistic. How should RH maintain a sliding base?
I didn't say
Hi,
The current version of FreeRADIUS in RHEL5/CentOS is 1.1.3. It is very
unlikely the 1.1.3 version will ever be removed from RHEL5 because of
the commitment for version stability in an enterprise distribution. On
whoah.
apart from the fact that 1.1.3 had so many bugs and doesnt work
There has been a fair amount of confusion over how to get FreeRADIUS
packages for Fedora, RHEL, and CentOS, how to perform a build if a
pre-built package is not available, and how to do some basic maintenance
tasks.
So I've created a new FreeRADIUS wiki page with Red Hat specific
on Red Hat Systems (Was: Make
error - Solved)
There has been a fair amount of confusion over how to get FreeRADIUS
packages for Fedora, RHEL, and CentOS, how to perform a build if a
pre-built package is not available, and how to do some basic
maintenance
tasks.
So I've created a new
19 matches
Mail list logo
