Re: Centos Yum Packages

2010-04-20 Thread Alan DeKok
John Dennis wrote: > RHEL 6 which is under development and is currently in beta testing does > have FreeRADIUS 2.1.8. So a possible solution would be to upgrade from > RHEL 5 to RHEL 6. If FreeRADIUS 2.1.9 is released shortly I *may* be > able to get it into RHEL 6, 2.1.9 should be released in a

Re: Centos Yum Packages

2010-04-19 Thread John Dennis
On 04/19/2010 06:41 PM, Andrew Paternoster wrote: So what's the best way to move forward with this? It is possible for someone to take over what jdennis was providing with his YUM resp? Or do we all have to go back to building for the source if we want the latest ver? You can follow the instruc

RE: Centos Yum Packages

2010-04-19 Thread Andrew Paternoster
k.net...@lists.freeradius.org [mailto:freeradius-users-bounces+andrew=gpk.net...@lists.freeradius.org] On Behalf Of Alan Buxey Sent: Tuesday, 20 April 2010 2:16 AM To: John Dennis Cc: FreeRadius users mailing list Subject: Re: Centos Yum Packages Hi, > Another solution is to stabilize FreeRADIUS s

Re: Centos Yum Packages

2010-04-19 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, > Another solution is to stabilize FreeRADIUS such that the need for > frequent version upgrades is not necessary. Rather than adding new > features focus on bug elimination. Some projects have a stable branch > and an "future" branch. The pace of version releases for FreeRADIUS is > "bris

Re: Centos Yum Packages

2010-04-19 Thread John Dennis
On 04/19/2010 11:28 AM, John Dennis wrote: The simple answer is that you shouldn't expect FreeRADIUS to be rebased in RHEL, however if there are enough customer issues with FreeRADIUS 2.1.7 it can be brought up for consideration. I do want to clarify the above. The general procedure in RHEL is

Re: Centos Yum Packages

2010-04-19 Thread John Dennis
On 04/19/2010 10:40 AM, Alan Buxey wrote: Hi, for their 5.5 update. They usually follow the Red Hat release by a few weeks. (Or you might consider installing RHEL :-) Also you might want to be aware the RHEL 5.5 update contains FreeRADIUS 2.1.7, not 2.1.8 because 2.1.8 was not available when R

Re: Centos Yum Packages

2010-04-19 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, > for their 5.5 update. They usually follow the Red Hat release by a few > weeks. (Or you might consider installing RHEL :-) > > Also you might want to be aware the RHEL 5.5 update contains FreeRADIUS > 2.1.7, not 2.1.8 because 2.1.8 was not available when RHEL 5.5 was frozen. given that 2

Re: Centos Yum Packages

2010-04-19 Thread John Dennis
On 04/18/2010 07:17 PM, Andrew Paternoster wrote: Hi List Just wondering how to install Freeradius on Centos 5.4 using YUM now that the "Tech preview" is over for redhat. Your best bet is to contact centos.org and find out what their plans are for their 5.5 update. They usually follow the Re

Centos Yum Packages

2010-04-18 Thread Andrew Paternoster
Hi List Just wondering how to install Freeradius on Centos 5.4 using YUM now that the "Tech preview" is over for redhat. Thanks -- Andrew Paternoster Senior System Engineer GPK Computers Pty Ltd T 1300 854 223 F 1300 854 228 Did you know that you can now log faults just by sending an email to