Re: We are willing to pay to get support on this (Was: Cisco-AVPair cisco_vsa_hack())

2004-04-20 Thread Paul Hampson
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 12:30:54PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote: Le mar 20/04/2004 à 00:47, Paul Hampson a écrit : On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 03:51:12PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: On Sun, 2004-04-18 at 15:13, Paul Hampson wrote: On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 12:33:53PM +0200, Jerome Warnier

Re: Cisco-AVPair cisco_vsa_hack()

2004-04-19 Thread Pascal Polleunus
Hi, As Alan DeKok advised us, we upgraded to the latest CVS snapshot on 17/04/2004... and now it's working fine, thanks :-) Pascal Polleunus wrote: Hi, We are trying to do VoIP accounting using Cisco material but we've problems with the attribute Cisco-AVPair. We've defined

Re: We are willing to pay to get support on this (Was: Cisco-AVPair cisco_vsa_hack())

2004-04-19 Thread Guy Fraser
Jerome Warnier wrote: ...snip... There is also a crontab file in this directory, which uses most the other scripts there, but needs fixing before being (optionally) put into /etc/cron.d. This file needs fixing anyway, because it currently points to /usr/local/... Did not use any yet, so you are

Re: We are willing to pay to get support on this (Was: Cisco-AVPair cisco_vsa_hack())

2004-04-19 Thread Jerome Warnier
On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 17:13, Guy Fraser wrote: Jerome Warnier wrote: ...snip... There is also a crontab file in this directory, which uses most the other scripts there, but needs fixing before being (optionally) put into /etc/cron.d. This file needs fixing anyway, because it currently

Re: We are willing to pay to get support on this (Was: Cisco-AVPair cisco_vsa_hack())

2004-04-19 Thread Paul Hampson
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 03:51:12PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: On Sun, 2004-04-18 at 15:13, Paul Hampson wrote: On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 12:33:53PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: On Sun, 2004-04-18 at 05:43, Paul Hampson wrote: On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 11:41:27PM +0200, Jerome Warnier

Re: We are willing to pay to get support on this (Was: Cisco-AVPair cisco_vsa_hack())

2004-04-18 Thread Jerome Warnier
On Sun, 2004-04-18 at 05:43, Paul Hampson wrote: On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 11:41:27PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: On Sat, 2004-04-17 at 06:02, Paul Hampson wrote: On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 09:55:01PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 20:42, Alan DeKok wrote:

Re: We are willing to pay to get support on this (Was: Cisco-AVPair cisco_vsa_hack())

2004-04-18 Thread Jerome Warnier
On Sun, 2004-04-18 at 12:33, Jerome Warnier wrote: On Sun, 2004-04-18 at 05:43, Paul Hampson wrote: On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 11:41:27PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: On Sat, 2004-04-17 at 06:02, Paul Hampson wrote: On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 09:55:01PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: On

Re: We are willing to pay to get support on this (Was: Cisco-AVPair cisco_vsa_hack())

2004-04-18 Thread Jerome Warnier
[...] Please find here-attached my fixed debian/rules. It seems to work, though there is still a problem because conf gets copied *under* /etc/freeradius-dialupadmin. Fixed in this release, see attached rules. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/debian$ dpkg -L freeradius-dialupadmin /. /etc

Re: We are willing to pay to get support on this (Was: Cisco-AVPair cisco_vsa_hack())

2004-04-18 Thread Jerome Warnier
[...] The debian packages should also probably depend upon libsnmp5-dev|libsnmp4.2-dev instead of libsnmp4.2-dev only. Is there any reason why not to do it like that? -- Jerome Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] BeezNest s.a r.l. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See

Re: We are willing to pay to get support on this (Was: Cisco-AVPair cisco_vsa_hack())

2004-04-18 Thread Jerome Warnier
On Sun, 2004-04-18 at 15:01, Paul Hampson wrote: On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 02:34:44PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: The debian packages should also probably depend upon libsnmp5-dev|libsnmp4.2-dev instead of libsnmp4.2-dev only. Is there any reason why not to do it like that? Last time I

Re: We are willing to pay to get support on this (Was: Cisco-AVPair cisco_vsa_hack())

2004-04-17 Thread Jerome Warnier
On Sat, 2004-04-17 at 06:02, Paul Hampson wrote: On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 09:55:01PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 20:42, Alan DeKok wrote: ?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me?= Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Try the latest CVS snapshot, it may work better there.

We are willing to pay to get support on this (Was: Cisco-AVPair cisco_vsa_hack())

2004-04-16 Thread Jérôme Warnier
Le lun 12/04/2004 à 17:37, Pascal Polleunus a écrit : Hi, We are trying to do VoIP accounting using Cisco material but we've problems with the attribute Cisco-AVPair. We've defined with_cisco_vsa_hack = yes, and it works for other Cisco's VSA. In rlm_preprocess.c, in

Re: We are willing to pay to get support on this (Was: Cisco-AVPair cisco_vsa_hack())

2004-04-16 Thread Alan DeKok
?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me?= Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Try the latest CVS snapshot, it may work better there. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: We are willing to pay to get support on this (Was: Cisco-AVPair cisco_vsa_hack())

2004-04-16 Thread Jerome Warnier
On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 20:42, Alan DeKok wrote: ?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me?= Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Try the latest CVS snapshot, it may work better there. My first remarks: I was surprised to find the dialup-admin as a Debian package. Though, it is completely broken. The files

Re: We are willing to pay to get support on this (Was: Cisco-AVPair cisco_vsa_hack())

2004-04-16 Thread Paul Hampson
On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 09:55:01PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: On Fri, 2004-04-16 at 20:42, Alan DeKok wrote: ?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me?= Warnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... Try the latest CVS snapshot, it may work better there. My first remarks: I was surprised to find the