Re: Compiling with newest OpenSSL

2010-08-26 Thread David Mitchell
Alan DeKok wrote: > David Mitchell wrote: >> I misread that page thinking that v2.1.x would just give me 2.1.9 and >> that master would be 2.1.10. Either way, I was able to get v2.1.x (aka >> 2.1.10) to configure openssl using the LIBS="-ldl" addition. I'm not >> sure what's changed in the "master"

Re: Compiling with newest OpenSSL

2010-08-26 Thread Alan DeKok
David Mitchell wrote: > I misread that page thinking that v2.1.x would just give me 2.1.9 and > that master would be 2.1.10. Either way, I was able to get v2.1.x (aka > 2.1.10) to configure openssl using the LIBS="-ldl" addition. I'm not > sure what's changed in the "master" that configure seems to

Re: Compiling with newest OpenSSL

2010-08-25 Thread David Mitchell
Alan DeKok wrote: > David Mitchell wrote: >> I'm hitting some snags trying to compile from source with the newest >> OpenSSL. I have compiled Openssl 1.0.0a and installed in /usr/local/ssl >> (the default location). With FreeRadius 2.1.9 configure fails to detect >> with errors which look like some

Re: Compiling with newest OpenSSL

2010-08-25 Thread Alan DeKok
David Mitchell wrote: > I'm hitting some snags trying to compile from source with the newest > OpenSSL. I have compiled Openssl 1.0.0a and installed in /usr/local/ssl > (the default location). With FreeRadius 2.1.9 configure fails to detect > with errors which look like something which is possibly

Compiling with newest OpenSSL

2010-08-24 Thread David Mitchell
I'm hitting some snags trying to compile from source with the newest OpenSSL. I have compiled Openssl 1.0.0a and installed in /usr/local/ssl (the default location). With FreeRadius 2.1.9 configure fails to detect with errors which look like something which is possibly a problem with my OpenSSL inst