Hi List,
we are currently using rlm_ldap to check against a LDAP backend, which
works fine so far. rlm_ldap is configured to use a BaseDN of
ou=poeple,dc=example,dc=org. We have also specified a group membership
filter and are trying to enforce group memberships via the combination
of
Am Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2013, 09:29:48 schrieb Rudolph Bott:
Hi List,
we are currently using rlm_ldap to check against a LDAP backend, which
works fine so far. rlm_ldap is configured to use a BaseDN of
ou=poeple,dc=example,dc=org. We have also specified a group membership
filter and are
Hi,
thanks for the fast reply.
Am 2013-01-09 09:43, schrieb Michael Schwartzkopff:
Am Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2013, 09:29:48 schrieb Rudolph Bott:
Hi List,
we are currently using rlm_ldap to check against a LDAP backend,
which
works fine so far. rlm_ldap is configured to use a BaseDN of
On Wednesday 09 January 2013 09:29:48 Rudolph Bott wrote:
Is there is possibility to set a different basedn for group lookups OR
another feasable solution (e.g. modify the filter...?). Filter and
groupmembership_filter are currently set to:
Create a new ldap module called e.g. ldap2 (just copy
Am 2013-01-09 10:27, schrieb Tobias Hachmer:
On Wednesday 09 January 2013 09:29:48 Rudolph Bott wrote:
Is there is possibility to set a different basedn for group lookups
OR
another feasable solution (e.g. modify the filter...?). Filter and
groupmembership_filter are currently set to:
Create
On Wednesday 09 January 2013 10:48:16 Rudolph Bott wrote:
Am 2013-01-09 10:27, schrieb Tobias Hachmer:
On Wednesday 09 January 2013 09:29:48 Rudolph Bott wrote:
Is there is possibility to set a different basedn for group lookups
OR
another feasable solution (e.g. modify the filter...?).
On 01/09/2013 08:29 AM, Rudolph Bott wrote:
However, our groups are stored underneath ou=groups,dc=example,dc=org
- so rlm_ldap is not able to find them with the basedn shown above. We
Unsolicited advice: that's not a great schema, and you should look to
move away from it.
are also not
Hi Phil,
we fixed the problem by using the radiusGroupName attribute in the
user's object instead of posixGroup-Objects.
Thanks for your help anyone!
Am 2013-01-09 12:38, schrieb Phil Mayers:
On 01/09/2013 08:29 AM, Rudolph Bott wrote:
However, our groups are stored underneath
8 matches
Mail list logo