[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ..i guess we are all looking at development of EAP-TNC with interest..
There's no major reason why the EAP-TNC patches couldn't be in 2.0. I have minor issues with the formatting of the code, but enough people use it that it seems to be OK. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
