Thanks a lot again, Alan !!!
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : Re: [RE]FreeRADIUS proxy - Is Proxy-State (AVP 33) mandatory in the
Acct Response?
Date : Sat, 05 Sep 2009 01:17:37 +0200
From : Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com
To : FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius
Dear FreeRADIUS Users,
I have one FreeRADIUS server proxying accounting RADIUS to two different hosts.
One of the remote hosts is receiving the requests and answering the responses,
but processing the details file very slowly (keeps being marked as dead all the
time).
I realized that
Cristina Miyata wrote:
I realized that this host doesn't responds the accounting request with the
Proxy-State (AVP 33). I checked the RFC2865 and it seems that it is mandatory
the remote server responds the accounting response with the Proxy-State (AVP
33).
While the attribute is
.
-[ Received Mail Content ]--
Subject : FreeRADIUS proxy - Is Proxy-State (AVP 33) mandatory in the Acct
Response?
Date : Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:38:38 -0400 (EDT)
From : Cristina Miyata cmiy...@lycos.com
To : freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org
p {margin-top:0px;margin-bottom:0px;}
Dear
Cristina Miyata wrote:
1) If FreeRADIUS doesn't use Proxy-State for nothing, how it matches the
requests with responses? Using only the Packet Identifier (AVP 92)?
Very well, thank you. :)
But really... packet src/dst ip/port, plus RADIUS code Id.
Proxy-State isn't needed.
2) Since it
5 matches
Mail list logo
