Re: Freeradius 2.1-1: failure modes

2009-03-11 Thread leopold
No luck. For some reason unlang does not catch SQL fail return code. Only if there is no failure I see it is evaluating return code it prints in debug mode ++? if (fail) ? Evaluating (fail) - FALSE But when SQL return really fails it does not evaluate this condition and nothing is printed in

Re: Freeradius 2.1-1: failure modes

2009-03-11 Thread Alan DeKok
leopold wrote: No luck. For some reason unlang does not catch SQL fail return code. OK... Only if there is no failure I see it is evaluating return code it prints in debug mode ++? if (fail) ? Evaluating (fail) - FALSE And you deleted the lines JUST ABOVE THAT which gave you the value

Re: Freeradius 2.1-1: failure modes

2009-03-11 Thread leopold
radius.conf - redundant redundant_sql { # sql1 sql2 fail - I tried to comment this line but it does not help } sites-enabled/default - authorize { ... redundant_sql if (fail) {

Re: Freeradius 2.1-1: failure modes

2009-03-10 Thread leopold
This is great Alan! This is exact answer I wished to hear Thank again for your help. Alan DeKok-2 wrote: leopold wrote: I want to keep NAS table replicated in redundant SQL servers for failover reasons, is this fair? Yes. How do you propose solving SQL NAS table replication

Re: Freeradius 2.1-1: failure modes

2009-03-10 Thread leopold
Ivan/Alan, Other then killing radiusd are there any other solutions to force radius to drop request if all databases cannot be reached ? With the latest release 2.1.4 my failover works fine, but still if there is a network issue connecting to ALL Databases I do not see any practical reason

Re: Freeradius 2.1-1: failure modes

2009-03-10 Thread Alan DeKok
leopold wrote: For my situation since radiusd keeps everything in DB and if ALL databases cannot be contacted the radiusd should not respond at all. Is there any way to force radiusd to drop request and not to respond with Access-Reject? Try something like this: authorize { ...

Freeradius 2.1-1: failure modes

2009-03-09 Thread leopold
Guys, I have a question about different failure modes in FreeRadius, basically I want to differentiate between different scenarios of failures and return a proper response (if any) to NAS device. Failure example: Backend database is down Right now FreeRadius returns reject to NAS rlm_sql (sql):

Re: Freeradius 2.1-1: failure modes

2009-03-09 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, Right now FreeRadius returns reject to NAS rlm_sql (sql): Failed to connect DB handle #8 rlm_sql (sql): reconnect failed, database down? rlm_sql_getvpdata: database query error [sql] SQL query error; rejecting user rlm_sql (sql): Released sql socket id: 8 ++[sql] returns fail Sending

Re: Freeradius 2.1-1: failure modes

2009-03-09 Thread leopold
Thanks Alan for reply. Connection to another backup DB from the same radius server will help only if the primary DB has real problem. But if there is a network issue to connect to DB and DB is fine just radius daemon fails to communicate to the database so in this case radius needs not to respond

Re: Freeradius 2.1-1: failure modes

2009-03-09 Thread tnt
Say I do not want to return reject in this case and I want the switch to understand that radius is down and retry another radius server (a backup/failover). So call a script that executes killall radiusd - that should do it. But that's insane. Because if I return reject the NAS device treats

Re: Freeradius 2.1-1: failure modes

2009-03-09 Thread leopold
Thanks Ivan for your reply. Regarding redundant databases:yes it can help because the problem will arise only if all of them sql1,sql2,sql3 are not reachable or dead. We are keeping NAS table in database and do not use flat files I am having another issue with readclients = yes option I can't

Re: Freeradius 2.1-1: failure modes

2009-03-09 Thread tnt
I am having another issue with readclients = yes option I can't keep this option set to yes in all 3 files: sql1.conf,sql2.conf,sql3.conf I want to keep NASes in the database and use DB replication to all 3 databases so all 3 databases have exact same mirrored data. The problem happens that it

Re: Freeradius 2.1-1: failure modes

2009-03-09 Thread leopold
I want to keep NAS table replicated in redundant SQL servers for failover reasons, is this fair? Now, if NAS is kept only in one SQL server this will become a single point of failure and if this particular DB fails then radius application cannot just seemlessly failover to another redundant DB

Re: Freeradius 2.1-1: failure modes

2009-03-09 Thread Alan DeKok
leopold wrote: I want to keep NAS table replicated in redundant SQL servers for failover reasons, is this fair? Yes. How do you propose solving SQL NAS table replication challenge? Use 2.1.4 when it comes out. I've fixed this problem, and this behavior will be allowed. Alan DeKok. -