Hi all,
we did several test using UnixODBC instead of OCI driver, results are good
and issue seems to be fixed.
Thanks all
Fulvio
2012/3/22 Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com
fulvio fabiani wrote:
Hi all,
sorry for the misunderstanding.
We execute same test (with two radClient) on
Hi all,
sorry for the misunderstanding.
We execute same test (with two radClient) on Freeradius 2.1.12 following
the instruction in doc/bugs documentation, result is the same.
Find attached the output.
We are now executing same test on freeradius v2.1.x GIT, I will update with
the results,
Hi all,
please find attached also the output produced executing same test with
2.1.X GIT version,
Best regards
Fulvio
2012/3/22 fulvio fabiani fabiani.ful...@gmail.com
Hi all,
sorry for the misunderstanding.
We execute same test (with two radClient) on Freeradius 2.1.12 following
the
fulvio fabiani wrote:
Hi all,
sorry for the misunderstanding.
We execute same test (with two radClient) on Freeradius 2.1.12 following
the instruction in doc/bugs documentation, result is the same.
Find attached the output.
It's crashing in the Oracle libraries.
You're probably not
Hi all,
we did some additional test by setting multithread debug on FreeRadius and
executing freeradius process tracing on server
Follow the server tracing output (each crash the same output):
*select(11, [4 6 7 8 9 10], NULL, NULL, {0, 302488}) = 1 (in [8], left {0,
302488})*
*recvfrom(8,
hi,
in previous emails you were asked to run 2.1.12 or the latest 2.1.x GIT release
- but this output is from 2.1.11
alan
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
Yes I know,
we did not yet test the latest 2.1.x GIT release and test with 2.1.12 or
2.1.11 give same results.
Is it mandatory?
2012/3/21 Alan Buxey a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk
hi,
in previous emails you were asked to run 2.1.12 or the latest 2.1.x GIT
release
- but this output is from
Hi,
Yes I know,
we did not yet test the latest 2.1.x GIT release and test with 2.1.12 or
2.1.11 give same results.
well, you were asked to test the 2.1.x GIT release as it has some rather
important fixes in it.
as for the 2.1.12 - yes. mandatory as thats the latest release code to
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:04 AM, fulvio fabiani
fabiani.ful...@gmail.com wrote:
Follow the server tracing output (each crash the same output):
2012/3/21 Alan DeKok al...@deployingradius.com
See doc/bugs
So you decide to run strace instead of using gdb as written in
doc/bugs? And how did you
fulvio fabiani wrote:
Yes I know,
we did not yet test the latest 2.1.x GIT release and test with 2.1.12 or
2.1.11 give same results.
Is it mandatory?
It's mandatory to follow instructions on this list.
You were asked to do certain things which would let us help you.
You've ignored
Hi Alan,
We did same test with freeRadius version 2.1.12, unfortunately same result:
as we start second radClient, Freeradius instance crash.
Answering previous questions, no we don't use rlm_sql, we use perl module,
that via oracle perl driver, executes query on the database.
BR,
Fulvio
Hi,
We did same test with freeRadius version 2.1.12, unfortunately same
result: as we start second radClient, Freeradius instance crash.
Answering previous questions, no we don't use rlm_sql, we use perl module,
that via oracle perl driver, executes query on the database.
cool.
fulvio fabiani wrote:
Hi Alan,
We did same test with freeRadius version 2.1.12, unfortunately same
result: as we start second radClient, Freeradius instance crash.
Answering previous questions, no we don't use rlm_sql, we use perl
module, that via oracle perl driver, executes query on the
Hi Phil,
thanks for your answer.
Do the 2.1.12 fix this kind of problem?
We did some additional analysis, we found that with this configuration:
- 1 freeradius
- 1 radclient
everythings works,
but with
- 1 freeradius
- 2 radlicent
the freeradius instance crash as we start the second
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:47 AM, fulvio fabiani
fabiani.ful...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Phil,
thanks for your answer.
Do the 2.1.12 fix this kind of problem?
2.1.11 has some known bugs, fixed in 2.1.12 in newer. It might be one
of them. If you don't want to waste anyone's time, re-run your tests
on
Hi,
thanks for your answer.
Do the 2.1.12 fix this kind of problem?
did you try with 2.1.12 ? its got a lot of fixes related to this behaviour.
there is really no need to question/query the advice given. use the latest
version - IF there is still a problem then its important as then it
Hi all,
i’ve a problem with concurrent accounting requests with free radius 2.1.11.
In details:
I’ve 2 free radius servers balanced by bigip f5 through roundrobin
algorithm. I use to send account request using radclient on a machine
placed in the same sub-netmask of f5, and it forward the
On 16/03/12 16:57, fulvio fabiani wrote:
Hi all,
i’ve a problem with concurrent accounting requests with free radius 2.1.11.
Upgrade to 2.1.12 and try again.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
18 matches
Mail list logo
