Re: Load testing tool recommendation

2008-05-14 Thread Anders Holm
Message - From: A L M Buxey [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 5:28:00 PM GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal Subject: Re: Load testing tool recommendation Hi, Hmm.. I *am* referencing the radius server

Re: Load testing tool recommendation

2008-05-14 Thread Jens Link
Anders Holm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Curious... It's a fairly beefy Linux box with GigE NIC What kind of NIC? There are some (cheap) cards which are using the CPU pretty heavily. cheers, Jens -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Berlin: http://www.guug.de/lokal/berlin/index.html

Re: Load testing tool recommendation

2008-05-13 Thread Anders Holm
: Load testing tool recommendation Wireless could be the problem if you have some wireless links between radius server and your NAS. Alan DeKok wrote: Anders Holm wrote: In my tests, radclient has been /slower/ the radtest processes forked from a Perl script. 100 requests using my forking

Re: Load testing tool recommendation

2008-05-13 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, Nope, no wireless involved. Good thought though! :) its not doing DNS lookups each time is it? alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Load testing tool recommendation

2008-05-13 Thread Anders Holm
-users@lists.freeradius.org Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 2:55:56 PM GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal Subject: Re: Load testing tool recommendation Hi, Nope, no wireless involved. Good thought though! :) its not doing DNS lookups each time is it? alan - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See

Re: Load testing tool recommendation

2008-05-13 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, Hmm.. I *am* referencing the radius server with FQDN ... Lemme flip that switch and see what I get to play with ... Good catch .. It's letting me ship some more packets through per second.. no final figures yet, but starting to hit 5k pkts/sec, though the radius server is still not

Re: Load testing tool recommendation

2008-05-11 Thread Alan DeKok
Anders Holm wrote: In my tests, radclient has been /slower/ the radtest processes forked from a Perl script. 100 requests using my forking Perl script takes 2.2 seconds to complete. 100 requests using radclient takes ~8x, i.e 16.7+ seconds to complete. You can run radclient -x to see

Re: Load testing tool recommendation

2008-05-11 Thread Marinko Tarlac
Wireless could be the problem if you have some wireless links between radius server and your NAS. Alan DeKok wrote: Anders Holm wrote: In my tests, radclient has been /slower/ the radtest processes forked from a Perl script. 100 requests using my forking Perl script takes 2.2 seconds to

Re: Load testing tool recommendation

2008-05-10 Thread Anders Holm
, that is a possibility as well ... //anders - Original Message - From: Ivan Kalik [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FreeRadius users mailing list freeradius-users@lists.freeradius.org Sent: Friday, May 9, 2008 4:26:37 PM GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland, Portugal Subject: Re: Load testing tool recommendation http

Load testing tool recommendation

2008-05-09 Thread Anders Holm
So, I'm building a complete solution, from scratch. As such, the business owners have some requirements on how many requests it should be handle today per second and some point in the future as well. Would there be any good load testing tools, or some handy way to figure out how many tps my

Re: Load testing tool recommendation

2008-05-09 Thread Ivan Kalik
http://wiki.freeradius.org/Radclient Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP Dana 9/5/2008, Anders Holm [EMAIL PROTECTED] piše: So, I'm building a complete solution, from scratch. As such, the business owners have some requirements on how many requests it should be handle today per second and some