Thanks very much, I wish that the version 2.1.9 will be released soon.
Sunhualing
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> sunhualing wrote:
> > Hi Alan DeKok:
> >Are you sure it is the PEAP module,not the TTLS module? why?
> >And when will the 2.1.9 be released? thank you ve
sunhualing wrote:
> Hi Alan DeKok:
>Are you sure it is the PEAP module,not the TTLS module? why?
>And when will the 2.1.9 be released? thank you very much!
They both have the same code, and they both should be fixed.
Alan DeKok.
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freera
Hi Alan DeKok:
Are you sure it is the PEAP module,not the TTLS module? why?
And when will the 2.1.9 be released? thank you very much!
sunhualing
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Alan DeKok wrote:
> sunhualing wrote:
> > Hello everyone:
> > I am using a freeradius-2.1.8, with eap-tt
sunhualing wrote:
> Hello everyone:
> I am using a freeradius-2.1.8, with eap-ttls mschap v2. I happen to
> get a problem that some attribute missing in the
> Access-Accept message, while it appears in the first Access-Challenge
> message. I still find that those attributes appear
> tunneled
Hello everyone:
I am using a freeradius-2.1.8, with eap-ttls mschap v2. I happen to get
a problem that some attribute missing in the
Access-Accept message, while it appears in the first Access-Challenge
message. I still find that those attributes appear
tunneled reply , i use the debug mode.
Hi,
I think that I have a similar problem when freeradius has to send
Access-Accept with multiple Cisco-AVPair="ssid=..." entries. Do you think it
will be fixed in the near future ?
Thanks.
Konstantin
_
Konstantin KABASSANOV
L
Alan DeKok wrote:
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
Hi,
We formulate our reply inside of the virtual server dealing with EAP and
send it back to the outer server. This is the only way I could think of
to insert the Inner identity into the Access-Accept.
...
update outer.reply
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We formulate our reply inside of the virtual server dealing with EAP and
> send it back to the outer server. This is the only way I could think of
> to insert the Inner identity into the Access-Accept.
...
update outer.reply {
Us
Erg,
Still no closer to fixing this / finding a work around. Is anyone else
using a similar configuration and finding this issue?
Arran
Arran Cudbard-Bell wrote:
Hi,
We formulate our reply inside of the virtual server dealing with EAP and
send it back to the outer server. This is the only
Hi,
We formulate our reply inside of the virtual server dealing with EAP and
send it back to the outer server. This is the only way I could think of
to insert the Inner identity into the Access-Accept. It all works
fine... however it seems there's a bug when dealing with multiple
instances of
10 matches
Mail list logo