Hello Alan
Thanks for your reply.
Would you please tell me whether the scenario is correct or not?
1) We obtain the clear text password in the authorization section of our
module.
2) We populate the request-config_items with the clear text password.
3) The CHAP module authenticates the user using
Ali Majdzadeh wrote:
Would you please tell me whether the scenario is correct or not?
1) We obtain the clear text password in the authorization section of our
module.
2) We populate the request-config_items with the clear text password.
3) The CHAP module authenticates the user using the
Hello all
I have written an rlm_module. It works fine. Here, we have clients which
should be authenticated using CHAP passwords. In the radiusd.conf, I have
mentioned my module before the CHAP module in the authentication section.
Also, I have found that my module should populate the
Ali Majdzadeh wrote: I have written an rlm_module. It works fine. Here,
we have clients which
should be authenticated using CHAP passwords. In the radiusd.conf, I
have mentioned my module before the CHAP module in the authentication
section. Also, I have found that my module should populate the
Hello Alan
Yes, I am sure that the code works correctly, because the CHAP module
accepts the clear text password which I have provided in the
request-config_items. Below is my code for the authorize section of the
module:
static int netbill_authorize (void *instance, REQUEST *request)
{
Ali Majdzadeh wrote:
Hello Alan
Yes, I am sure that the code works correctly, because the CHAP module
accepts the clear text password which I have provided in the
request-config_items. Below is my code for the authorize section of the
module:
That looks OK.
Thu Oct 25 13:18:42 2007 :
Hi allIs it possible to send Vendor Specific Attributes through an rlm module?I use the following method to send standard attributes through an rlm module:(As suggested by the template itself)
reply = pairmake (User-Name, root, T_OP_EQ);pairadd (request-reply-vps, reply);request-reply-code =
Ali Majdzadeh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(As suggested by the template itself)
* *reply = pairmake (User-Name, root, T_OP_EQ);
pairadd (request-reply-vps, reply);
request-reply-code = PW_USER_NAME;
No, that last line is wrong. Completely and totally wrong. No
template or examples suggests
Hi allWhat is(are) the coresponding function pointer(s) for start and stop packets in an rlm module? (Something like xxx_authenticate)Should I define my own custome funtion pointers? Then, How can I test them?
Best RegardsAli
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
Hi
Ali,
Could
you let me know how did u capture the vendor specfic attributes in the
rlm_module ?
like
the one you have described earlier
getenv(USER_NAME) , getnev(Cisco_AVP) ?
Rgds,
Shankar ganesh
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Hi ShankarYes, of course.code:char USER_NAME[128];VALUE_PAIR *vp_iterator;vp_iterator = request-packet-vps;while (vp_iterator){ if (strcmp (vp_iterator-name, User-Name) == 0)
strcpy (USER_NAME, vp_iterator-strvalue); vp_iterator = vp_iterator-next;}This method also works for vendor specific
Hi againBy the way, the better approach to catch attributes' values is through the usage of the following function:vp_prints_value(char *out, int outlen, VALUE_PAIR *vp,int delimitst);RegardsAli
On 9/12/06, Ali Majdzadeh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi ShankarYes, of course.code:char
Shankar Ganesh C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you let me know how did u capture the vendor specfic attributes in the
rlm_module ?
Read the source code to rlm_files. VSA's are just normal
attributes. You can refer to them by name.
Alan DeKok.
--
http://deployingradius.com - The
Ali Majdzadeh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is(are) the coresponding function pointer(s) for start and stop packets
in an rlm module? (Something like xxx_authenticate)
The accounting sections handle accounting packets.
Alan DeKok.
--
http://deployingradius.com - The web site of the
14 matches
Mail list logo
