Re: Small suggestion for FreeRadius debug output

2009-10-15 Thread Alan Buxey
Hi, I have been going through debug output for the last couple of days now attempting to resolve various configuration problems, and while not essential, it would be nice to see how much time has elapsed between a request and response for example... add a small 'x' ie radiusd -Xx

Re: Small suggestion for FreeRadius debug output

2009-10-15 Thread Patric
Alan Buxey wrote: add a small 'x' ie radiusd -Xx (this was mentioned on this list a couple of days back) Arg, Im a dumbass... Sorry I must have missed it :) Thanks! Patric - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

RE: Server Suggestion

2005-07-15 Thread King, Michael
If the AP's are wireless, then CPU is more important, as EAP uses SSL, which has a large CPU impact. Would FreeRADIUS take advantage of a Dual CPU system? - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

Re: Server Suggestion

2005-07-15 Thread Alan DeKok
King, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would FreeRADIUS take advantage of a Dual CPU system? If you run it in multi-threaded mode, yes. But unless your server is *very* busy, dual CPU's are overkill. Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See

Re: Server Suggestion

2005-07-14 Thread Alan DeKok
King, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We're going to be setting up a freeRADIUS server to service around 400 simultaneous connections. (500 AP's, 4000 users, about 400 online at once) Accounting info would be on another different server.(Not part of FreeRADIUS) That's a pretty small

RE: A suggestion

2004-08-02 Thread Graeme Hinchliffe
] [mailto:freeradius- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Graeme Hinchliffe Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 10:41 AM To: FreeRADIUS list Subject: Re: A suggestion On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 15:42, Anson Rinesmith wrote: Fri Jul 30 09:19:26 2004 : Info: rlm_sql (sql): Attempting to connect

RE: A suggestion

2004-08-02 Thread Anson Rinesmith
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:freeradius- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Graeme Hinchliffe Sent: Monday, August 02, 2004 3:21 AM To: FreeRADIUS list Subject: RE: A suggestion On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 17:53, Anson Rinesmith wrote: That would be okay, if each

Re: A suggestion

2004-08-02 Thread Alan DeKok
Anson Rinesmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There in lies the problem. At what point can you make that recognizable relationship. Does anyone know where I can find a list of all possible messages output to radius.log? No, sorry. The source code is all there is. Maybe what we need is a new

Re: A suggestion

2004-07-30 Thread Paul Bender
I agree, unique delimiters are good. However, for the example you gave, it looks like you could split using ': '. Anson Rinesmith wrote: To whomever this may concern: I am working on a bit of perl that will take the Log File and insert it into a database in real-time. For future versions of this,

Re: A suggestion

2004-07-30 Thread Graeme Hinchliffe
On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 15:42, Anson Rinesmith wrote: Fri Jul 30 09:19:26 2004 : Info: rlm_sql (sql): Attempting to connect to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/radius could you not use RegEx to match each portion of the logfile? you could use something like lex/yacc to tokenise and parse the loglines or the

RE: A suggestion

2004-07-30 Thread Anson Rinesmith
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:freeradius- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Bender Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 10:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: A suggestion I agree, unique delimiters are good. However, for the example you gave, it looks like you could split using ': '. Anson

RE: A suggestion

2004-07-30 Thread Anson Rinesmith
:41 AM To: FreeRADIUS list Subject: Re: A suggestion On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 15:42, Anson Rinesmith wrote: Fri Jul 30 09:19:26 2004 : Info: rlm_sql (sql): Attempting to connect to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/radius could you not use RegEx to match each portion of the logfile? you could use