Re: Anyone using radzap?

2005-04-13 Thread Alan DeKok
"Mike Cisar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The latest CVS snapshot should contain fixed radwho & > > radzap. They should work if you copy them to a 1.0.2 > > distribution, and re-build. > > Thanks Alan, I'll grab them and give it a try. I've also put them into the 1.0.x distribution, if w

RE: Anyone using radzap?

2005-04-13 Thread Mike Cisar
> The latest CVS snapshot should contain fixed radwho & > radzap. They should work if you copy them to a 1.0.2 > distribution, and re-build. Thanks Alan, I'll grab them and give it a try. Cheers, > Mike < - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.

Re: Anyone using radzap?

2005-04-11 Thread Alan DeKok
"Mike Cisar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can't say as I've been using it, for the obvious reasons... but I've wanted > to several times in the past couple months :-) The latest CVS snapshot should contain fixed radwho & radzap. They should work if you copy them to a 1.0.2 distribution, and re-

RE: Anyone using radzap?

2005-04-10 Thread Mike Cisar
Hi Alan, > So far as I can tell, radzap hasn't worked for a while. If > so, I'll poke it, and see if I can't get it to work. This > may, however, involve changing the command-line options... Can't say as I've been using it, for the obvious reasons... but I've wanted to several times in the

Re: Anyone using radzap?

2005-04-06 Thread Alan DeKok
> So far as I can tell, radzap hasn't worked for a while. If so, I'll > poke it, and see if I can't get it to work. This may, however, > involve changing the command-line options... Hmm... a little bit of work on "radwho" turns it into a front-end for radzap. $ radwho -Z blah... | radclient