Re: Banning users in a nice way...

2007-06-29 Thread A . L . M . Buxey
Hi, > Oh and by broken I mean windows XP type broken, as in will only attempt > TLS authentication broken... and sends the username and password a user > logged into the machine with by default broken... and so can never work > out of the box broken. FWIW, an unconfigured Windows XP box will n

Re: Banning users in a nice way...

2007-06-27 Thread Arran Cudbard-Bell
> For your case 1): depends. If there actually is a user cert on the client's > box and its CN does not contain an @, same as above applies. If their CN does > contain an @, well, then you are pretty much lost. Shouldn't be many though. > No certs on users boxes, completely vanilla installs... W

Re: Banning users in a nice way...

2007-06-27 Thread Stefan Winter
> What we really want to be able to do, is for users with broken software, > force the wireless association to succeed, and put them on the > unauthorised VLAN. Of course just sending a plain old Access-Accept > packet isn't sufficient, as it requires the tunneled authentication to > succeed as wel

RE: Banning users in a nice way...

2007-06-27 Thread Josh Howlett
> Has anyone got any ideas ? > > I'm assuming theres no way to do it.. Not that I can think of. You shouldn't be able to coax a supplicant onto a network by munging authentication (this is a *good* thing). josh. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html